Search results

Have you noticed that when you look up at the moon, you always see the same features? You can see craters and patches of different colors. With a pair of binoculars or a telescope, you can make out even more detail. But no matter how you look at the moon, you're always seeing the same landscape...

Do I see here that Buzz Irwin was the one Christian who went to the moon? --Dave

Let's see what they have to say. I have not heard of any. --Dave

Not true. All evolution Is based on the globe model. --Dave

The telescope obviously was not strong enough to reach the ship at that distance. --Dave

You would travel in a circle on a flat plain just as you would if the earth were a globe. --Dave

The picture shows a flat horizon with no curvature from left to right of a far greater distance than the that of the ship in the distance ahead of you. If you had a telescope you would be able to see the whole ship which is proof there is no curvature. If the earth were curved a distance we...

There is no curvature in the horizon of this pic. Flat earth does not mean there are no mountains, it means the earth is not a globe or ball. --Dave

A water fall is not a lake or an ocean. The elevation of land is not curvature. Any one can stand on the beach of any ocean, stand on any mountain top, or look outside the window of a jet, scan the horizon from left to right and see no curvature. There are lens on cameras that can show a curve...

Notice the distortions from a fish eye lens, the horizon is actually seen to be flat and the earth is motionless. --Dave

The only way to know is to proceed with arguments "for" or "against" this proposition. That "nut-cases" exist on this site may be true indeed, and you may be one of them for all we know. --Dave

The sun and moon circle the flat earth. This ancient symbol represents this:

Here is a short list of observable proofs for a flat earth: 1. There is no visible curvature. 2. All bodies of water are absolutely level. 3. All aircraft move over a stationary flat plain. Arguments against these facts contradict sensory perception. --Dave