Search results

The lunar module was about 13,000 lbs. The astronauts weight with suits would be about 200 to 300 lbs I would suspect. The 300 lb astronauts kick up dust as they walk and run on the moons surface and leave deep clear footprints, but a 13,000 lb module descending at a greater speed than the...

Notice from this short video of astronauts walking on the moon all the dust, dirt, sand, they kid up into the air. --Dave https://video.search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?fr=sfp&hsimp=yhs-001&hspart=omr&p=video+of+astronaut+walking+on+the+moon#id=2&vid=edaa7507d6d92cccd2ed036a439fa487&action=click

How much did the lunar module weigh? --Dave

The clearly defined foot prints would be impossible on a planet with no moisture on it. The foot prints would be undefined like when we walk on dry sand. --Dave

I looked back at every post, I posted a video "10 reasons why people think the moon landing was a hoax", which gives both sides of the story. You responded with a video that dealt only with the flag waving. Can you address the module problem? --Dave

Yes, I watched, the amount and degree of flag waving is not due to the manipulation of the twisting of the pole. So the experiment was not a duplication of the event that supposedly took place on the moon. But that is only one anomaly, there many all of taken together show a staged event. My...

Nothing to say about the moon module? --Dave

You're the one who didn't watch the video. Orion passes though the belts into outer space and then must pass through them on the way back to earth, nothing there about three weeks in the radiation belt. --Dave

The lunar module pic from NASA is lacking two things that should be clearly visible that prove we never went to the moon. 1. The rocket blast that slows the module as it lands would have left a small crater under the module. 2. The dust created by the rocket blast would have left dirt on the...

NASA engineer, "Orion will pass through the Van Allen Belts. An area of dangerous radiation. Shielding will be put to the test as the vehicle cuts through the waves of radiation. Sensors aboard will record radiation levels for scientists to study. We must solve these challenges 'before' we send...

I understand and had always accepted the Copernican Model of the universe. I have not accepted the multi universe model because it is not empirically verifiable. I never gave any consideration of a flat earth model, other than that it was the accepted model of the ancient world, until about a...

Empirical evidence and logic trump theoretical physics. Explain how things "visibly" move through the atmosphere except a spinning earth. --Dave

Humans, animals, birds, planes of all kinds, vehicles of all kinds, are solid physical objects that move though the atmosphere that surrounds everything on earth. But we are told that the solid physical rotating earth does not move through the atmosphere that surrounds it. If it did we would...

I'm going to visit my kids and grand kids today, I wish you all a very merry Christmas. --Dave

The atmosphere is not a "container", we are not "in" the atmosphere as if "in" a physical object. The air and space are not physical objects. We and the earth are physical objects and are not equal to or the same as air or space. We and the earth, planes and trains move through the air and space...

That's a false equivalence argument. We are not "in" the earth, which would be the equivalence of "in" the the train, as it moves. "In" is not the same as "on" in your argument. In the train is not the same thing as on the earth. The air is not the earth or the same thing as the physical...

I want to finish this rotating earth problem first. --Dave

If you had watched the videos you would have seen the horizon bend both in and out. --Dave

A commercial jet travels at 600 to 800 mph. We can see a jet travel across the sky. Strange that we cannot see the ground moving at 1000 mph from a jet. --Dave

Do you know how fast the earth is said to rotate? --Dave