Search results

Don't be upset with yourself, you're not stupid, you just have not studied flat earth history. The debate here focuses on heliocentrism vs flat earth. Geocentrism is noted but not the subject of debate. Both flat and earth centered models accounted for everything that sun centered cosmology...

Thanks for looking at the whole clip. The main point was that an attempt to use the vacuum chamber, with a man in it, the suit failed. The space suit failed badly and as far as I can tell that experiment was never tried again in that particular type of chamber. --Dave

The vacuum of space What would the vacuum of space have on the Apollo moon landings? NASA VACUUM CHAMBER - Why They Dont Test With Astronauts --Dave

Much to respond to here but one point at a time. The earth is rotating/moving The atmosphere is not "in" the earth. So why would the atmosphere be moving with it? The atmosphere is not "part" of the earth. --Dave

The flat earth was the original model of cosmology. It accounts for everything in the sky and the calendar. --Dave

I watched the videos and they challenged my notions. I was not flat earth and I'm still not at this point. --Dave

Even the majority of students in college did not take physics, or golf. --Dave

Ok, thanks. I will give this a good amount of time to study it. --Dave

Now you have put forth a testable argument that I can prove wrong. I am not weak minded and so I have falsified your argument that only the weak minded are fooled by flat earth videos. The physics of it all can be very difficult to grasp, but I am very aware that classical physics has been...

It takes 24 hours for the sun to circle a flat stationary earth. --Dave

Thank you. --Dave

I said it would not be a usual debate because the flat earth argument is made from video which is visible empirical evidence. It's not mainly theoretical. And that makes sense because it's about what we can handle feel and see. The problem with modern physics is it's almost all theoretical...

I think the possibility that the earth just might be flat and stationary and it might be true that we never went to the moon is what's got everyone all discombobulated. These tool's you offer are also questionable. The case for a globed cosmos seems very much a house of cards and contradiction...

Is there a "rant" website somewhere you could go to? This is a debate site, do you not comprehend the difference? --Dave

Your so kind, thank you for your concern. --Dave

I sure hope you only write like this and don't actually talk like this. Your rants aren't contributing any thing intelligent here. Make an argument or go away. --Dave

You made the point that you see stars through you're equipment so let's see them. --Dave

No, I want to see what you see. You don't need credentials with me. --Dave

Correct me if I'm wrong but does he say a fact is "how long" it takes something to fall in "one second"? 0:55-0:59 Or does he mean, or say, how "far" it takes something to fall in one second? --Dave

Flat universe--yes, flat galaxy--yes, flat earth--ironic. Just trying to make you smile. Can you direct me to a site, or a video that you like, about "how" Newton made these discoveries you mention. --Dave