Search results

To justify their Darwinism.

What you believe is irrelevant. Apart from my clearly stated challenge.

Because I watched your video and described its interpretations accurately? I primarily read it in English. There isn't a lot of interpretation work necessary. That's a false dichotomy and you're shifting the focus to avoid the challenge to what you believe. Genesis describes the creation of...

There isn't anything that you can deliberately teach me on this subject. What I have are challenges to what you believe. For example: Your video makes the mistake of asserting that shamayim and erets must mean "skies" and "land." This is simply not the case. They can mean those things, but...

I can't define it as the "time" between events. :D

For an informed discussion of Genesis, you are required to not present your beliefs embedded in posts as if they were indisputable. For example: Because the Bible doesn't say "evening and morning"? You're going to have to do much better than an argument from silence. Day 2 does not conclude...

I like the definition of time like this: "The distance between events."

Can you answer the question?

Call me Ishmael.

I'm Batman!

You should keep believing it then. 👍

This chick sure does have a lot of people she will not talk to ... :D

Your worst nightmare. :D

Bang-up job you're doing not responding. :chuckle:

Can you name some of these people? I bet you cannot find any on TOL. There are plenty here who claim that Genesis specifically teaches Darwinism.

Because you say so? What does this mean? Have you ever read a science book? Because you say so?

I made it. Thanks, mods. 🆙

Nightmare Finches: Real Science Radio gives news updates from Bob Enyart with a small maskless victory in federal court to Fred Williams and Bob's discussion of the Alfred Hitchcock sequel: The Birds, Darwin's Finch Nightmare. This is an update of RSR's classic List of Not So Old Things, testing...

Try to react wildly to what people say, not what you wish they had said. Of course statistical analyses are done. I specified a particular type of study. Because you've done the study, right. :rolleyes: What prediction? :idunno: That wasn't a question of comparative analysis. It looks...

Yeah, but species is a vague and malleable term. For instance, lions and tigers are descended from a common ancestor population and are different species, but although dogs are the same way, but are one species. I'm just guessing, but I think there was only fewer than 10,000 created kinds.