Search results

So they were lying when they said it was too far away to see with their own eyes?

Great. Do you have a rational objection? Where is the radar data for this incident? Hint: You don't have them. Great. Do you have a rational objection? Great. Do you have a rational objection? You do realize that looking at this object from that distance would be impossible, right? Why do...

Explanation, with commentary. Ie, it's just another out-of-focus commercial airliner.

Great. Now put up the video of this thing.

:rotfl: Darwinists are morons.

Stop right there. It's "Critical race theory, or racism."

It's a sufficient factor, not a necessary factor. :)

He's a homo.

This is how the conversation goes: Pentagon: We received a video. It is a video. Username: ALIENS!!!!!!

Darwinists -- you -- are morons. Nope. It said nothing about aliens. The pic I posted is from one of the videos proclaimed as convincing evidence of alien life. The video was released by the US military and is among the reports addressed in the document. :rotfl: It's bokeh. You got duped again.

What are you talking about now? Did the report deny the possibility that the photo I posted is of an airplane? News flash: It didn't. News flash: You're on an "aliens" bender based on exactly no evidence. News flash: The report doesn't do anything for whatever your agenda is. News flash...

So you'll be able to quote the report denying the possibility that this is an airplane:

The point is that the report never mentions aliens. Darwinists will fall for anything.

Has it ruled out out-of-focus commercial airliners?

Yep. Soccer is the place for him.

It has a report on videos of out-of-focus commercial airliners? Why?

What if a bird lands on it?