Search results

If you think that the bureaucratic tyranny being practiced over this pandemic, which was manipulated into existence and maintained by similarly nefarious means, is not a precursor to a world in which a global authority requires a bowed knee before it will allow you to buy a bagel, you're a wild...

What? Did you misread the question? What do you think it means to say "time is consistent"? So you think time is a created, physical thing. What is it made of? You need to take immense care when using a scientific theory to prop up your theology. You haven't shared links to proofs...

What do you think it means to say "time is consistent"? "Applies to"? What does that mean? It sounds like you're taking the name of a mathematical theory and using it for a philosophical agenda. Problem 1 is that you aren't describing the distinction in any effective way and problem 2 is...

The Michelson and Morley experiment did not return an Earth orbital velocity of 0kps.

We prefer a rational, scientific approach. This is not an explanation of how what I say cannot be correct. It's a presentation of your weird theology and has no bearing on what I have said. Heck, I could agree with everything you said here and it would not change a thing about what the math...

For example, inspired by post 1,069: Einstein's E=mc2 is based on the first term of a Taylor series. He describes how subsequent terms can be ignored because the high radicals in the denominators make negligible difference when adding them to the answer. Using E=mc2, all you can ever get is an...

There is nothing between the lines. Try responding to the lines. Yep. And I provide reasons for my assessments. For instance, when I say I reject Einstein's work, you counter with: "Other people don't." Such responses are a complete waste of time. They are the fallacy of an appeal to...

I don't know what that means. Or you could engage over the substance and stop contributing nonsense. When you're done counting the adherents to ideaologies, we can discuss something useful, like the ideas. I don't know what that means. Nope. Credentials are irrelevant. We want you to...

No, I don't. I don't believe as you do. To engage rationally, you can either show how your case is correct or refute mine. When you say: "These people are on my side," the proper scientific response is to laugh in your face. Learn to engage rationally. When you declare Einstein to be...

What is that supposed to mean? You bring up who believes things as if it should affect what I think. I prefer a rational discussion. No. Notice how you want to declare the math to be on your side, but when challenged on it, you bring up examples where the theory is simply assumed, not...

So what? No, they don't.

MERS came and went SARS came and went. The Wuhan flu came, "scientists" decided to add vaccines, and it stayed.

Yikes.. :D

Sounds ... clunky. How would we test such an idea?

You've not understood a single word I've said, have you?

The other idea is that lightspeed is vastly greater in regions of lower gravity. With us near the center of the universe, the gravity environment tends to increase as light approaches us, thus it is always slowing down.

:banned: :chuckle: I share your concerns. I think that the solution to the distant starlight problem might lie in the universe being stretched out after light was created. However, that theory, too, has problems.

If a state had done nothing, it would likely be much better off than this planet.

The vaccines probably helped extend this pandemic.

Acceleration requires a force that either simulates gravity, or is gravity. The act of throwing the rock in the air changes the rock's* gravitational environment. So you can say that its motion affects it, but that is just another way of saying that gravity's effect on it has changed. When it...