Search results

For anyone following along, we're talking about this video: Maybe. Maybe it has been noticed plenty of times. Maybe Steven is the first. I don't think it makes much difference either way. Isn't what I've shown what we're discussing? Einstein sought to explain the discrepancies between...

For some rocks. Ever mixed concrete? Depends. Is the fossil a 2D or 3D structure? A 3D structure would be impossible under too much pressure. There is always going to be pressure involved in rock formation, but the only necessary items and processes are the ones I outlined. Mix water...

Actually, I think the math at this point is fairly elementary. It's easier when it's written down in front of you. It starts getting difficult when it goes into the Tau function. "It is a spherical wave if you take the objective of the moving observer" - that is exactly what the proof is...

He has a book.

Einstein's derivation of E=mc2 is based on a distance/time calculation that has a big ugly ol' square root in the denominator. Back in his time, there were no fancy computers to calculate such things. However, they did have a tool called a Taylor series that could provide approximations of the...

E≈mc2

Explaining how light slows down is not a very good way to prove that it doesn't slow down. This is word mash. A "unit" of time cannot be the same thing as a "concept" of time. Words have meaning. Those words have different meanings. Do I have to share it a seventh time? Because you say so...

You don't know what you're talking about. Light is slowed down by passing through a glass of water. There needs to be a distinction when we talk about a "unit of time" and the "concept of time." They cannot be the same thing. You cannot declare that you "adhere to Einstein's theories," but...

Here's the problem: You have a theological agenda and have invented a theory of physics that you can't explain and nobody else adheres to. When challenged on the theology, you appeal to Einstein using links that assume the primacy of his ideas. But when Einstein is challenged, you agree with the...

Have fun staying stupid.

When you go back and retract the numerous nonsense posts you've made, then you can explain these reports to me.

Typical. Called on his useless attempts at argument, posts links he's never read, let alone understood.

It's surprising that the Darwinists don't gravitate more toward what is going on with untested vaccines pushed into a population amid a pandemic. The Chinese-US-made disease that emerged from the Wuhan lab is all but gone. It is the variants, which the vaccines forced into the foreground, that...

Nope. Here's a hint for how stupid you are. Literally any idea, no matter how ridiculous, can be asserted without there being any fallacious reasoning involved. It's only when a syllogism is attempted that fallacies can manifest. This is why you and your ilk never use the word "therefore."...

Nope. You're worse than ignorant. And there's another fallacy-riddled argument.

That's why a sensible initial policy is treatment, not vaccines. The Wu flu would have been all but over by now had we done nothing rather than the insanity that has drawn it out. What we have is a state health bureaucracy driven by people with a vested interest in developing vaccines. The...

Of course it is. Nothing you say stands up to the demands of logic and reason. COVID-19 isn't a deadly pandemic in the vein of the situation at hand when those other diseases were a problem. It took about six months before we had the data and experience to treat and save practically every...

The plan was to deploy vaccines amid a pandemic to drive variants into existence and keep the panic going. The experts know that this is what vaccines do. SARS and MERS came and went without vaccines. This one has been kept alive by them.

That's the logical fallacy called false dichotomy. You need to think through your useless posts more rationally.