Search results

Entropy is the tendency toward lower states of order. Information — or an informer, or work — is required to overcome entropy. Evolution postulates that the common observation of an increase in biological complexity is because all life is descended from a universal common ancestor by means of...

Sure. I don't know what that means. I don't know what this means, either. Do you know what entropy is?

Those statements come across as platitudes. Science is the process of throwing out ideas when they are shown impossible by evidence, logic or reason. Calling it "spiritual" might be accurate, but it's not helpful. Except that one is justified by evidence, logic and reason, while the other...

You do? Does anyone else "have science"? What is wrong with having a theory? Is that different from the speed of light of nearby stars? I know all of these arguments. They have been encountered and discarded numerous times. Read up. (y) This is "the science" that "you have"? 🤣 Dead...

I don't know about that. I've never seen you before. I read your post and replied to it. I ain't expecting anything. You hold to the idea that "six days" can't mean what it plainly says. I want good reason to support your assertion. Is "yohm can mean something other that 24 hours" the only...

One day someone will engage rationally. Right?

If you want to claim that the Bible cannot mean what it plainly says, you have to give good reason. We claim that the Bible means more than it says when talking about the serpent in the garden. For example, we point to Paul's teaching to show that it was actually the devil talking to Eve...

What are you talking about? That is an almost lifelike depiction of former US vice president Joebiden.

Evidence? Evolution is denied by physics' laws. You can present all the evidence you like, but we are always justified in rejecting it without consideration.

Which is like saying that horses being real leads atheism.

Yummy.

The vaccines are driving the pandemic.

Dogs.

I don't know that we do. Assuredly, it would be much more comfortable with a couple of carrier groups sinking transport craft, but we put quite a bit into our defense.

A lack of "proof," or evidence, does nothing to eliminate an idea.

Perhaps. My point was more philosophical. China is not going to invade if it thinks the US would be involved to that extent. So if it does act, Taiwan needs to defend itself. And there are reasons that it hasn't, most notably being the whole landing issue. My disagreement here is with the...

Entropy sinks Darwinism. Unless the provide a mechanism that turns sunlight into genetic information.

A US intervention will mean very little to whether a Chinese invasion would succeed. The onus is always on the defending nation.

That's leftists.

Because they do not respect the scientific method.