Search results

Yeah. You've spent exactly zero words responding to the substance of what we have said.

You don't care about the very real issues.

You don't care about the very real issues.

Yep. You're a conspiracy nut.

Brain has no interest in an honest assessment of the facts.

And Brain thinks that it was all justified and had no effect on the election.

Whatever the case, he believes that the FBI, DOJ and both houses of Congress were not working to undermine Trump's presidency, avidly backed up by the establishment media and big tech. He has to believe that there wasn't six years of outright lies and misdirection pumped into the populace. He...

Brain is one of those conspiracy nuts who thinks that former US vice president Joebiden won the election.

Entities?

No, it doesn't. In fact, the passage you seem to be referring to implicitly endorses the Biblical timeline. Watch: 2 Peter 3 Beloved, I now write to you this second epistle (in both of which I stir up your pure minds by way of reminder), that you may be mindful of the words which were spoken...

This is a false dichotomy. COVID-19 was developed in a lab by people using organisms that have spent about 6,000 years adapting to their environment after God created "everything good" and then creation went through "the fall" and "the flood."

I can't read much Japanese, but that gives me an idea.

An appropriate word. Get with the program? The program is this: You assert evolutionary theory against the demands of the laws of entropy. You make excuses for your story, but provide nothing substantial that might justify it. Darwinism is a failed theory. Get with the program.

Well, the links you copied from have a good imagination, but you again expose your ignorance. This is abiogenesis. Darwinists are forever wailing that this has nothing to do with evolution.

I'll be the judge of that. Guess what? The Bible does indeed say "six days." Of course you can. My head hurts. And one of them does. And in Genesis it means six days with evening and morning. What logic? "I don't like this tiger. He reads minds." No, it doesn't. The Bible says that...

I don't read every post of yours. :) I've read all your ones to me. You're not getting it. The Bible says "six days." You say that it cannot mean what it plainly says. Finding what might even be a valid scientific objection does not show that the Bible cannot mean "six days." They best it...

Wow. There must be a whole discussion going on between us that I am utterly unaware of. How does the speed of light mean that the Bible's account cannot mean six days?

I'll let you in on a little secret: I've spent a grand total of about four hours in the US. All in airports. You seem upset with how simple my presentation is and unwilling to present anything to counter it. The best we've seen from you is your assertion that day can mean a non-24- hour...

Yeah. Unfortunately, you don't seem to understand mine. Those are details. Science is simply the process of how we discard ideas. We can discuss the details, but they aren't the scientific process. All irrelevant if you're willing to respect the scientific method. If you're willing to...

We can explain the processes that form littoral features. You don't get to piggyback your nonsense in on a known process. Explain how sunlight powers genetic development as we can explain why beaches form. But you won't explain how. So you have no answer. We know your claim. Justify it...