Search results

Bald assertion.

Yeah, no.

Light speed does not in any way corroborate the claim that the earth is very old (viz., beyond let's say 6000 years). Not unless you're begging the question. Which is what I was saying you were doing in the first place.

For one, Abraham prophesied it: " And Abraham said, My son, God will provide himself a lamb for a burnt offering" Genesis 22:8

Probably drunk as a skunk.

Climate change is never going to be or cause an extinction level event.

You're begging the question that the world is as old as it looks. You're also begging the question that it looks old, which is something I agree with, but it's apart from whether it actually is as old as it looks like it is.

It depends on how you're using the word. Marke doesn't have the same meaning as you do. I myself simply have left meaning government services and right means no government services, with extreme rightists being anarchists, where even governing itself is an unwanted government service. But...

Look at his profile pic: he is such a gross pervert. The model names for the three Tesla vehicles, S, 3 and X. Plain.

So you've got former President Trump as a "leftist" now. Get real.

Straw man, nobody said they were. Paul made Timothy and Titus bishops, told them to make new bishops, and to teach the new bishops to make new bishops themselves. He started Apostolic succession. Traditions who have continued to celebrate this sacrament of Holy Orders are the ones obedient to...

That's a total straw man and red herring but OK.

Against 31 reasons to reject the jab, here is 1 reason to not reject the jab: https://edition.cnn.com/2021/12/23/politics/trump-vaccine-covid-effectiveness/index.html Emphasis in the original.

Of course. That's just not what happened. As I said to RD above, Apostolic succession is not Apostolic replacement, and the Church was obeying the Apostle Paul's own written scriptures in continuing to celebrate this sacrament (Holy Orders).

It absolutely is there. Paul consecrated bishops and then instructed them how to consecrate new bishops themselves, and instructed them to instruct new bishops, to consecrate new bishops too. That's right in Scripture. Keep in mind that Apostolic succession is defined right in the OP in the...

That's not an argument nor is it a fallacy, it's just factual; a true proposition.

Mr. Foreman values chastity, and finds sexual perversion ( ΠΟΡΝ) not only unethical but also tasteless. I would agree.

Is there some Protestant doctrine that isn't probable opinion? I mean there's no Protestant authority on doctrine, or on anything that the Bible may mean. Every Protestant doctrine has to be 'probable opinion,' because you can't validly appeal to any other authority, because there is no valid...

He's just begging the question; just declaring. I can do that too, and I don't need a PhD to do it either. Why listen to someone who's just assuming that his claim is true? He needed to do the same thing that needs to be done to my OP, if it's to be corrected. Some Protestant needs to show...

CORRECT. There are tons of Catholics who don't believe in the Real Presence, like @annabenedetti here. The fact of the matter is that the earliest Church uniformly believed in the Real Presence, and that Calvinist Protestants taught against it. As for Lutherans and 'high church' Anglicans...