Search results

Of course. Namely, the limits are the rights of everybody else. And whose rights are being infringed if someone declares exemption from vaccine mandates? No one's. You don't even need a religious belief exemption, you can just do that for no reason other than that it is your right to do it.

Liberalism is American, in fact instead of liberalism we might be justified calling it Americanism. We were the first polity who implemented what is known today as liberalism, which is when a regime is governed according to the separation of powers, constitutionalism, the rule of law, and...

And this as far as I'm concerned is due to the fact that to measure or determine speed (distance /time) you need both a measure of distance (a ruler) and a measure of time (a clock, or any harmonic oscillator), and relativity suggests that both of these are affected such that rulers shrink and...

As far as I'm concerned, we need to answer the question, Are we going back to what we used to do? Or are we going to change and do something new? My answer is the former, we should go back, to something. Something we've already done and done well, we need to go back to that. I'm conservative...

The August 29 error in Afghanistan, that was killing too, did those responsible get the Bread of Life knowingly given to them?

Rights are not and are not supposed to be subjective.

There is by definition no justification to murder, but there are justified killings. If your family's lives are threatened unless you kill an innocent man, then that's not murder. Murder is by definition a free choice. We have the right against being murdered, not just against being killed...

TL;DR ---- I also reject that. I am Catholic (I go to weekly Mass, and I get my cookie) and one of the Catholic things I'm considering is whether there exists an unconditional human right against being executed, period. Of course, Pope Francis has put the idea in my head himself, not only in...

Then ignore where it comes from and read it, don't commit the 'genetic' fallacy. Where a proposition comes from doesn't affect its truth or falsity. It means perversion. And Christ did mention perversion, and in a negative light. Your narrative, that somehow the Lord didn't and doesn't care...

Try again:

Twice. Just in the first book of the New Testament! Matthew 5:32 and Matthew 19:9. ... But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of ΠΟΡΝ, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery. ... And I say...

Yes. By Christians. Rights were always defended by the Church, even before we knew exactly what they were.

Only those who don't come to Mass. He does. He wants you to come to Mass.

Here's some grist for our mill: ... Homosexuality Not Just a Sin But a Crime: To "legitimize" is to declare something legally valid. Christian leaders widely yet tragically legitimize this gross sexual perversion. For 3,500 years Judeo-Christian legal jurisprudence has recognized homosexuality...

A lot of users do not accept the legitimacy of this institution. BTW how does England do the separation of religion and state, what with your monarch being the head of your country's official religion there? It's just by there being no laws that are only because a religion wants them, right...

Oh you're welcome Arthur!

That's what this thread's all about. The bishops are basically libertines. Unless the Apostles specifically taught otherwise, the bishops leave you alone. There's almost no exceptions to this libertine tendency, if the Apostles didn't specifically mention anything about it, then they leave...