Search results

We seem to have lost several posts! :confused:

Welcome back Dave, The following is a repost of an argument I made while you were gone after several of us had taken near simultaneous photos of the Sun's position above the horizon from our various locations. I'd love it if you'd take a look... The last few days I've been playing around with...

Now that's a cool series of photos!

I agree. I hear people criticize wikipedia all the time as though its just 85% crap but I've never found anything there that was anything other than informative and basically dead on. That's not to say that there isn't plenty of stuff that's probably bad but that's true of pretty much anything.

Precisely!

Well, I'm still stuck on the right triangle math stuff. Check this out... Patrick brought up the size of the Sun. In the context he was bringing it up in, it's completely irrelevant because the angles involved are all calculated from the point in the center of the Sun, regardless of how big it...

Wikipedia knows everything!

Did you notice that the area on that map that is daylight is completely surrounding the night?

So, according to this logic, rain comes when the windows of heaven are opened. So are the clouds above the windows of heaven? I have personally be in a plane above not only clouds but rain showers. Had I unknowingly flown through an open window into heaven? Obviously, the reference to the...

Oh! Well, that makes total sense - since its the time in Greenwich England.

This is what the terminator (the line between day and night) would have to look like if the FET map is accurate... I found that at the following website.... Flat Earth Dome Model I fiddled with the numbers until I got it to match the photo I took from my house with the Sun .1° above the...

I know! I seem to always get that wrong. It really should be CUT (Coordinated Universal Time) and I know for sure it isn't that but don't know why (except that it spells a real word) and I never can remember which out of order way they do it. I'll try to do better.

You're actively in the process of denying that math works, Patrick! That isn't honesty of any kind, intellectual or otherwise. You're making a fool of yourself and you ought to be ashamed. The fact that you're not, is precisely the problem! (Yes, I've taken you off ignore - for now - but don't...

It's nice the we used UCT time to take our photos because that allows us to know that it was 1:00am in Greenwich England when we were taking our first photos. We had one night were we started at 00:00 UCT but on this map that won't make much difference. 01:00 UCT puts midnight just to the west...

Yep I'm not mad about winning. I'm just tired of humoring him. He's dumb as rocks. Why waste my time? I'd rather discuss it with you and the others here who aren't crazier than soup sandwiches.

I've never been so frustrated and irritated and insulted by anything I've ever discussed in my entire life! What I would find satisfying is if someone actually allowed sound reason to persuade their mind. That would make even years of wading through stupidity worth it. But at this point there's...

The size of the object that is 3000 miles above the surface is not at all relevant to a single syllable of the argument. You ARE stupid! I read one sentence of this. Welcome to my ignore list.

So am I to understand that there isn't going to be even one single attempt to make any response at all to post 1605? You have got to be kidding me! Please feel free to resume calling flat-earthers "retards" or any other pejorative you can think of.

So let's do some more math! This time let's assume that the distances on Earth as reported by Google Earth are accurate but that the Earth is flat. To make the numbers easy, lets assume a location on the equator on an equinox. And we'll use the same diagram as before... When it is Noon...

Hey! Great minds think alike! I like your diagram. Did you make that or did you find it online somewhere? I couldn't find one I liked so I just went with straight variables.