Search results

The guy is a complete embarrassment to himself. I know you'd condemn abuse of any sort without hesitation and he has no excuse in stating what he did in regards to that or your parenting.

Of course the Bible doesn't stipulate that five year old children aren't capable of murder just the same way it doesn't point out several other obvious things as why should it need to? Furthermore and in light of that I didn't post that the Bible expressly stated that five year old children are...

An AR-15 to shoot prairie dogs? A prairie dog would make a better senator.

Some of the state laws in America sure lack consistency. As I've mentioned in other threads, if someone is old enough to go and fight in a war then they're darned well old enough to sit in a bar and have a beer.

Hysterical in some ways although not in the way the guy intended presumably.

Nah, reading her is bad enough...

Anna would never say that anyone deserved to be abused let alone you being more deserving of such a crime. You ought to be ashamed of yourself.

See above.

Well, the Bible doesn't expressly state that two year olds can't be culpable of murder but why should it? Use some common sense.

The Bible is clear on the score where it comes to murder. It's pretty clear that five year old kids can't be culpable of it.

Of course a counter argument has been provided to you. I don't particularly expect you to listen to me but you should at least listen to Clete who has countered it all ends up and whom I'm in agreement with on this score. That being said you've had the obvious pointed out to you prior whether...

Well, if it is a false claim then it's equally false when you do it in relation to me. Well no, it's not the same criteria as anyone as reflected in law. Adults are held to a different standard than children because they're fully developed whereas obviously children are not. If you disagree...

The one getting emotional here is you. How can a five year old be a murderer at all RD? How are they in any way old enough to be aware of their actions at such an age, to act with full malice aforethought etc? Of course I've argued contrary with obvious counters based in logic and common sense...

A five year old child can't be convicted of a capital crime for again - obvious reasons that have been outlined multiple times already. They're not old enough to be cognizant of their actions, to understand what they're doing in relation to ramification/consequence, integral components to their...

Hardly. As much as I disagree with Clete (although not here) at least he gives straight answers to questions without resort to prevarication, dodge or childish deflection. If it's anyone's "hypothetical" then it's JR's as he is the one who contended that children as young as five can rightfully...

That's a shame, you were starting to answer questions and now you're back to the predictable juvenility. Ho hum.

No, because under law no five year old child can be accused of such. Do you think a five year old can possibly fulfil the criteria where he/she can rightfully be charged with murder? If so, how?

Do you agree that five year old children are incapable of murder? Straightforward question.

What are you on about? Of course it's not "my hypothetical" as it's plain that five year old children aren't capable of such. Do you agree?

Ironic that she's called Tenpenny considering she's not the full shilling...