Search results

Hmm, how many insults have I thrown your way through all of this? Have I called you retarded? Dumb? Similar? Might wanna watch out for the shards of that meter because it's well and truly in your own house. And that is my last on this issue.

Removing a child from abusive parents is care. Leaving a child in an abusive environment is complicit to abuse. There is no good reason for a child to die as a result when preventative measures are at hand. Frankly, this is going around in circles and hashing out the same over and over isn't...

There's plenty of cases where there isn't and noting the number of people on the planet is hardly relevant. If you fall through a piece of ice in the arctic ocean then there ain't gonna be many of those 8 billion people around to help are there? There's no good reason for a child in such...

Of course the child has done no wrong, way to state the obvious. Removing the child from a neglectful and abusive environment isn't a punishment, it's anything but. If you think that parents are rewarded for neglect/abuse then think again. The child is taken into care where depending on the...

Oh dear, did you think you'd offended me by being predictably immature? It's more amusing than anything, especially as I'm taken to task for anything resembling an ad hominem around here. If you don't or can't engage like an adult then don't, I sure ain't gonna lose sleep over it. Next doors...

If there's nobody else to step in besides authorities then that child is going to die. There's nothing immoral about having authorities to step in whatsoever. Common sense and reason go hand in hand. They may overlap on occasion but they're part of the same 'family'. I'd have no need to take...

Okay, I've tried to engage you in a conversation and instead of responding in kind you still resort to insults. That's on you. I don't deny you the right to own a gun either.

Okay, I'll try to take that into account but still, there's no need to snip sentences into three or more separate parts. Fine, I should have said your argument as opposed to you but I've addressed that in my latter. It really isn't. You might as well say that police are kidnapping someone if...

Then one more time shouldn't be too taxing. What does a 'drop' such as the one quoted say exactly? What wisdom it it conveying?

Then if a newborn doesn't have the right to food and water then having the right to life is pretty pointless if the parents don't supply them and nobody else should step in. You don't think that common sense comes from God? The ability to reason? That's fair enough, especially for the time...

Which ones are those then? If God imbues common sense and morality then what's the matter with most of the laws we have now? They're not of my making. I agree with most but not all. Why should you have the right to a firearm for self defense? Who said you or anyone else had the right to own a...

My posts aren't a "wall of text". I generally try to keep replies concise and at most within a few paragraphs and certainly not some massive block of words so there really isn't any need to parse anywhere near you do. You could easily reply with short paragraphs instead of parsing out...

Then what rights do you consider yourself to have? Is it not reasonable to construe that most of the laws we have are based on common sense and morality? Where do those come from? You might not have liked it but the comparison with those who believe they have a right to firearms is hardly Biblical.

Wrong, but "you" seem so self assured in your opinion that I'll leave ya to it.

There was nothing trolling about my post Jefferson and the floor was yours to explain just what "drops" like the above are actually supposed to be saying if you had any idea? I'm calling Q a bonkers, nutball outfit whoever is behind it that dupes people. I've been consistent on that since the...

The truth that you're reduced to insults instead of an argument? Why would that bother me? It's kinda expected with you. Oh, the...well, ya know...

It is needless as you can respond on point without doing it and I'm certainly not obligated to wade through a post that could address the arguments in a coupla paragraphs. You are being equally ridiculous with your warped nonsense about abduction in context as you are with your Hitler bunk. As...

Supposing it was actually official. It's garbage one way or the other. What exactly do you think "Q" is trying to say here? This stuff could be typed up by anyone...no specifics, just vague and not even cryptic nonsense. How can you or anyone else be duped by stuff like this?

After this I'm not replying further unless you quit with the needless parsing. Children have and should have rights, your insistence otherwise can summarily be dismissed. People aren't bound by your self righteous parameters of what they should and shouldn't do. It is not kidnapping if...

Oh dear, reduced to insults already? It's a telling irony that there's plenty who bleat on about their right to bear arms and yet kids having rights to food and water causes such consternation...