Search results

Take a chill pill dude. If you can't acknowledge that Trump lost the 2020 election then you're the election denier and that's not up for debate either, it's fact. Now, if you still can't accept this three years down the line then it's easy to infer that you have a problem with objective...

Rambling on does not help you. I quoted you directly in the latter part from your own post. Here it is again: "So, as long as you know that so and so is an accuser, you can easily know by inference that he/she is telling the truth or not telling the truth. Duh!"...

You seem to labour under many a delusion. I only call people white supremacists if their rhetoric incorporates such risible ideology. I certainly don't throw the term around with abandon around here. Quote me anywhere on this forum where I've advocated or defended such abhorrent views. I'll...

No, it wasn't. Had it stopped at the possibility that it could have been an air defense accident then perhaps. But as per usual, it went off into the realm of conspiracy rubbish.

Calling anna a white supremacist is as deranged as calling her an election denier. She, along with myself are neither white supremacists or have any truck with such and accept that Trump well and truly lost the 2020 election. One would have to be a monumental conspiracy dope to "think" otherwise.

It would seem that it may well be an accident although it's not fully clear even now. Certainly not a false flag operation. https://www.reuters.com/video/watch/idOV993116112022RP1

A lot of smileys but no answers again I note. Yes, of course an accuser is either telling the truth or not telling the truth. You claim that you can easily know by inference whether the accuser in question is doing either but won't explain as to how. I've already shown how ascertaining whether...

So, as predicted, you can't even explain your own post. Let me clue you in. It's not always easy to ascertain whether someone is being truthful or not so your inference stuff is just garbage. Someone could be telling you the truth about a certain matter and be highly convincing. Someone could...

Nah. You either explain this bit of word salad or don't: When you know that what an accuser is telling is the truth, it's very easy to know by inference therefrom that he/she is telling the truth. When you know that what an accuser is telling is not the truth, it's very easy to know by...

:LOL: Oh dear, I didn't realize you were one of those who bought into all that garbage so much. Trump lost. simple as.

Yeh, thanks for that little gem of insight 'Djengo Unhinged'...

Who was comparing? I was pointing out the dangers of religious extremism and thankfully in our respective countries, there's no chance of such coming about.

Uh, she conceded the election once she realized she'd lost and aided a smooth transition of power to Trump. She didn't whinge on about election fraud and throw tantrums about it so honestly, get a grip.

Thus far it's not been ruled out but ongoing. Nothing to suggest that Ukraine were responsible.

Oh dear, reduced to pedantry already? I'll alter my quote to take that into account: How do you "know" that an accuser is telling the truth or not telling the truth? You say it's very easy to know by inference. Explain how.

Many a modern day society is rampant with religious extremism that subjugates its populace to barbaric laws and treats women like second class citizens. See Saudi Arabia, Iran, Afghanistan etc.

Nah. I'll leave it thanks. Points been made and you still may be smarting over the 2020 results. Let me know how you can ascertain how someone is lying or telling the truth very easily by inference on the adjoining thread when or if you can...

About what? A poor performance that fell well short of expectations? Okay, be thrilled about that, hardly ruins my day one way or the other.

Seriously, you're going to post another TGP article? Been following this all day and nothing remotely credible to suggest that Ukraine struck Poland. You are out there with this atrocious war Jefferson, you have been since day one.

Hardly. She may well be dopey enough to buy into election fraud conspiracy bunk so she's not necessarily lying or telling the truth either. See the problem with your earlier now?