Search results

Well, except I don't. That's just you using the same little trope in lieu of actual argument but that's okay. I expect it along with all manner of immaturity and else with the far right. You know as much about actual fallacy as you do the source then. You'd be better acquainting yourself with...

Low flying aircraft would have squat to worry about where it comes to TGP then...

Then you should really stop using it dude. Having no time for a rightfully discredited wingnut source of "news" doesn't equate to not keeping up with political events. It just requires having more discernment where it comes to getting actual news and the like.

Anyone with some objectivity would question this film but I don't expect much of that around here these days...

The Gateway Pundit doesn't provide "information", it provides sensationalist garbage that appeals to its far right gullible readership. It's a completely discredited rag and with good reason. Those who buy into it without question must be fed up by now of how little any of its 'HUGE!' headlines...

Nah, just not gullible enough to buy into laughable tabloid crap.

Well, honestly, why would anyone be worried about a gateway pundit article?

Was hardly that but you're welcome! Sure, there's some of you who are happy enough with a stagnant forum instead of a thriving one so hey, enjoy!

You do realize that films that are based on "true stories" often sensationalize the subject matter?

Hmm, nothing misleading about any of my replies, they were absolutely on topic and straightforward enough. links provided and seems as though you still can't handle any disagreement or counter arguments without reverting to being an angry little man. Presumably the "child molesting faggot"...

My prerogative dude. Hardly as though I'm regular on here these days but then again, who else is really?

Hardly, was just a question. Were you? Ya know, when you could log in to the place on a daily basis and find loads of threads with traffic on them instead of nowadays when there's about two with new *responses* if that?

Were you even here when this place was actually vibrant?

Eh, it's a crying shame that this place has gone down the pan alright but that seems to be what dullards and zealots want for it. Ho hum. Enjoy!

Nah, but I get that the far right conflate any sorta criticism with the like which is kinda par for the course. kinda hilarious and ironic also but hey. I support freeing children from any sort of trafficking ring but sure don't support propaganda crap. Caviezel is promoting all sorts of...

The truth is that this place was once a thriving forum with an abundance of traffic, encouraged debate and was inviting to those outside of conservatism. The founder of this forum didn't want some stale echo chamber which unfortunately is what it's practically become.

Ya know, ya might wanna try that one time and if you do somehow hit one then you might wanna run away from a pack of angry dogs. That one's always been a lame trope JR. Oh, and where it comes to yips and similarly lame memes then the far right and far anything have it in abundance. Caviezel is a...

Who would those be exactly? This place is pretty much a far right echo chamber nowadays. A shadow of a shadow of its former self. That what you wanted?

The same Tucker Carlson who praised Trump on Fox but was revealed to despise the guy? Yay, so trustworthy...

Yeah, I thought so! Furthermore: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2023/jul/06/sound-of-freedom-movie-qanon-jim-caviezel (Warning: contains some long words and intelligent commentary...) The trafficking follows no motivation more elaborate than the servicing of rich predators, eliding all...