Search results

Nope, not an admin. Are we talking about "Our Triune God?" or did you mean 'Tally of anti-threads?' The point in Our Triune God thread was not to 'debate' but to present so that 1) we Trinitarians could grasp/share more fully what scriptures say, 2) that any, such as yourself, could...

🤔 In modern English, a cult is a social group that is defined by its unusual religious, spiritual, or philosophical beliefs, or by its common interest in a particular personality, object, or goal. Not sure if the definition is acquiesced...

It is a process, not to be confused with being convinced. Again, VERY subjective. Do you want me to 'feel' Anna needs God, or be able to explain things in a way that make sense and have value and meaning? You tend to posture 'us/them' in conversations. Me? I try most often to be between...

As if I have to convince you of anything.... Do as you like. Until you are ABLE to listen, there is no point to any of this.

The point was the alternate juror told us she 'thought' and then felt the other side did a better job. It becomes subjective for her. No, I don't want Chauvin in jail because they 'feel' he should be there. "Feeling' is incredibly subjective. Except when we do. The posturing thing never...

Really? You literally think you know that? As I said "Present indicative." You LITERALLY didn't think I addressed it? 🤔 So tempting...but no, you aren't being cogent and are incorrect. LOL, and there it is. Jesus read from it. Don't believe it? Look it up. 2 Samuel 12:9–10 1 Kings...

No, you are literally being inept. My 'Lord' AND my 'God.' You lose for want of reasoning ability. :nono: Not even an ι . I'll simply pray for you. Until you humble yourself, you'll never get away from problematic teaching from your cult. Until then, you are well beyond my help. -Lon

Yep, it means you are so heavily vested, layman and all, that you cannot be reasoned with (read it at your own Christadelphian peril when you are able to follow God instead of being so vested you cannot be bothered to think). Until then? Yeah, I'm not interested in posturing over and over and...

Incorrect, and I'm positive you cannot read a lick of Greek. You clearly cannot read a lick of it, Trevor. I'll post the Greek for you later. I've other things on my plate.

You don't get to 'feel' I'm guilty. I'd call mistrial. Of course not. She said 'think' and 'feel.' You and I agree, it might be why she was an alternate. I want someone with a bit of intelligence and a clear head deciding my case. Agree. He may take the stand in round two. :idunno...

No. Whenever it isn't about intent, it is about retribution on a federal, national scale and 'racial' justice. Town doesn't frequent here much anymore, but It'd be good to hear him explain the law a bit, especially between Minnesota and Federal laws. This was 'justice for Floyd and black...

I agree, but there has to be a proof of intent and it is always hard to do so with policemen who are authorized. What 'can' we prove? 1) that he went outside of police policy. Certainly he was negligent if not worse, but I don't remember that being proved. The jury may have had that...

Motive for doing so is difficult. If he could demonstrate that he and Floyd had had an encounter where he was afraid if George ever got up, it'd not be manslaughter. I'm sad that the courtroom was so publicized. Politics always (without fail, I believe) interfere with justice. This thread...

Right, because YOU thought my post was to you with Keypurr's name on it. YOU are the one that is wrong, even on this one. You misread a LOT, Trevor. You do. Not me. You do. YOU are the one insisting on "Will be" (a what, as in 'what' will "He be?" - YOUR insistence). While certainly it may...

I'm a capable grammarian. Couldn't care less. It matters not. It is just posturing on Trevor's part. Proof-texting. The majority are most often right. Try taking a couple of quizzes and hit 'majority.' It'll be right exponentially over wrong. We don't really have many Trinitarian...

At least to the best of your capability, which really isn't up to par at this time. 1) they don't say it is the only translation or preferred 2) the ones that do are far and few between 3) SHOW a trinitarian bias. You literally cannot. You are inferring it in lieu of something meaningful over...

You are jumping context: The IMMEDIATE context is "What name shall I say to Pharaoh." He isn't making an "I will be who you need me to be" Christadelphian meme to Pharaoh. He is telling Moses "Tell Him, I AM THE God, the Only God." "I will be" is part of that conversation but again, you...

It doesn't matter if you disagree. It matters 'why' and we all know 'why,' don't we, Trevor? The 'why' is because you are committed to an idea, no matter how obscure, REGARDLESS of what scripture actually may mean otherwise, right? Isn't that true, Trevor? I've shown you the verse...