This means there's no difference between breitbart, zerohedge, lewrockwell, and WaPo, NYT and WSJ. If that's your position . . . well, let us know if that's your position. That's what it sounds like.
You'd see it on the NRA's website. Republicans don't use this as part of their electioneering but that doesn't stop the NRA from being more factually accurate. The NRA constantly monitors headlines from smaller news outlets all around the country, looking specifically for any and all defensive...
You're right. Foiled again by the supposedly literal KJV lol. Where the KJV says "sapphire stone" (Ex24:10) the Strongs definition for the Hebrew is just "sapphire", not 'sapphire stone' lol. Curses! lol
Nonetheless though JR, while "like a mason would use" supports that it wasn't sapphire...
If it's not literally true, there's certainly no perceptible difference. They use mass murderers as poster children. Is it written in any playbook? I can't tell, because it looks like it could be, and if that's just accidental, then what's the difference anyway? They use mass murderers as...
You don't have to destroy the Second Amendment. You just have to take out a loan for 40 trillion dollars, using our collective 150 trillion dollar wealth as collateral, and start buying up guns. Then they're just gone. And folks like @TomO are fat cats living in palaces, they just don't have...
It also wouldn't have hurt Ukraine to have as liberal a gun policy as Americans do before the Russians showed up. I'd imagine there are at least dozens of Ukrainians right now who would go back in time if they could, and adopt something like our Second Amendment if they knew what was coming.
The criminals would sell even their guns for a million bucks a pop. A lot of them wouldn't even have to be criminals anymore.
If you pay one million USD for each gun, that genie's getting back in the bottle and that cat's getting back in the bag.
Why you're playing dumb here I can only guess. You know there are tons of varieties of stone. Granitic and basaltic for instance. Plus of course the Scripture names all sorts of stone so the Holy Spirit was aware that man had already named them according to type. It was some type of stone...
Come on. Think of it. No more school shootings, no more Chicago shootings, no more any shootings at all. No more guns. And whatever guns you own, they're each worth a cool million. Move into a mansion. Install a pool. Buy a Lambo. Plus no more school shootings. All for the low price of...
It had to be some kind of stone. Scripture doesn't say which, but that doesn't mean that it was like eternally a question mark as to what type of stone. And it definitely doesn't mean that literally nobody knew what kind of stone it was.
American household wealth is circa 150 trillion USD.
How much of that would Americans authorize to spend to clear guns from the streets?
There are 400 million civilian owned guns in America. What price would Americans pay for each one of them? In a fell swoop, a gigantic gun buyback, what...
And it falls on deaf ears for some reason, but you are trying to argue from silence. Silence doesn't mean you're wrong, but it doesn't mean I'm wrong either, or that this particular tradition is wrong or right. Silence doesn't conflict with anything. It logically can't be used to substantiate...
Catholic beliefs, off the top of my head:
Jesus is the Son of Man from the book of Daniel
Jesus is the only begotten Son of God
"whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life"
The Trinity is God
The Bible is the Word of God
The death and Resurrection of Christ really...