Search results

🤢🤮🤮🤮

This persecution was a part of something bigger that was happening. Do you know what that is? No, it's not. Not given the context. Again, you're missing the greater context of what was going on at the time. Something that was put on hold due to a certain nation's rebellion against her...

Which is fallacious. Traditions can be wrong. The Apostles WERE authorities. And they WILL BE authorities... in the coming Kingdom of Israel. Currently, their ministry is NOT authoritative, I advise against putting words in other people's mouths that they clearly did not mean or say.

Morality is absolute. Meaning, it would still be wrong prior to sin. Shouldn't have to. You're on a discussion forum. Present your arguments. Supra. I'm going to refer you to this thread on the age of accountability, and point out that children just come home from the hospital were not...

Refresher: https://shadowgov.com/

Persecution as a part of what? What promise of comfort are you talking about? Book chapter verse, please.

They are ENTIRELY RELEVANT to the point! You are committing the fallacy of special pleading. It's where you deliberately ignore aspects that are unfavorable to your point of view. Verses 2-3 destroy your overall position. Rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic won't prevent it from...

It doesn't matter. One is kidnapping, the other is a proper relationship. So what if you disagree? No one cares. Make an argument. No, I'm not. I'm not talking about being loved. I'm talking about loving. If you went into a house, and you had no way to leave, no matter if all your needs...

Why did you skip verses 2 and 3? Special pleading will not help your position. The deceit was telling her that she wouldn't die while leaving out the clarification "if you touch it." Something which would have been true, since God never said "you shall not touch it," ONLY "you shall not eat...

https://babylonbee.com/news/southwest-introduces-new-c-17-cargo-plane-capable-of-carrying-your-mom

Threes are everywhere...

Scripture in a moment, but first, a demonstration: A man takes a woman and brings her to his house, locks all the doors and boards up all the windows, and tells her to love him. Can she do so? Or will any "love" that is shown actually be love, and not just an imitation on her part, and/or a...

Probably helped that most if not all of the ones that He caused to fall were under his authority to begin with... Assuming archangels have authority over other angels, of course.

No one cares. Make an argument for your position. So what? What does that have to do with whether I'm correct or not?

I always find it fascinating that if you go back even just a few hundred years, people wrote letters with much greater detail and verbosity than people of the last couple decades. Even letters from soldiers in the American Civil War contained far more to them than from letters from people today.

No one cares. Why do you people keep leaving out the rest of what He said? Then the seventy returned with joy, saying, “Lord, even the demons are subject to us in Your name.” And He said to them, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven. Behold, I give you the authority to trample on...

I was referring to the scripture you provided, which, if I recall correctly, was NOT Acts 2:1-4. Not even close. I'm not saying he was made the pope. I'm saying he was given the keys to the kingdom (of Israel). People such as Idolater wrongly conflate this with being made pope. Is not Acts...

Not that I'm aware of. I was just replying to this discussion in a different thread, since it was somewhat off topic from the original post.