Search results

The horizon line, as I have already explained, perspective vs curvature. --Dave

Seems no one wants to comment on the videos I posted. There are clear contradictions in the videos, NASA vs Nikon P900. We all can agree that some one is faking it, but only by comparing both sides can we really know who. --Dave

Those are not inconsistent statements. We can see moving objects until they are too far away to see. --Dave

Not really, they speak for themselves, watch the video and see. --Dave

Yes, absolutely! NASA fakes everything. --Dave

Time lapse tells all --Dave

--Dave

How is that thread on "Falling apples" going??? :confused: --Dave

Flat Earth getting Too Close ??? --Dave

--Dave

Flat Earth and the Real Stars --Dave

--Dave

--Dave

I think you should start a new thread on "Why apples fall", sounds exciting. :the_wave: --Dave

NO CURVE AT 114,824 FT. AMAZING FLAT EARTH BALLOON FOOTAGE--Link --Dave

It's well know that we cannot see stars in outer space from outer space so where are they. Stars are lights in the sky that are close enough to see from earth. --Dave

The fish eye lens causes that distortion, most people know that. --Dave

No, I simply let those positions that oppose flat earth to stand as evidence for globe earth. I also let every one see both sides of the issue. The flat earth model is the least known and understood so I defend it by letting that position to be known. I think every one needs to make up their own...

--Dave

Falling apples don't tell us the earth is a globe or that it's flat. --Dave