Search results

Gravity The idea that there is a force that keeps everything, not literally attached to the earth, from flying off a spinning globe, is inherent (part of) it's own cosmology. That there is a force that keeps things on a flat stationary earth from floating in space is also inherent (part of)...

And just why, in your opinion, have so many posted here on this subject? --Dave

I am doing home work, almost every night. --Dave

I thought so. --Dave

A fighter jet flying at low altitude travels 500 to 600 hundred miles an hour and covers one mile in 6 to 10 seconds. Obviously they would be making nose down corrections constantly, but they don't. If these jets did not make any corrections they would soon find the earth dropping beneath them...

Don't be upset with yourself, you're not stupid, you just have not studied flat earth history. The debate here focuses on heliocentrism vs flat earth. Geocentrism is noted but not the subject of debate. Both flat and earth centered models accounted for everything that sun centered cosmology...

Thanks for looking at the whole clip. The main point was that an attempt to use the vacuum chamber, with a man in it, the suit failed. The space suit failed badly and as far as I can tell that experiment was never tried again in that particular type of chamber. --Dave

The vacuum of space What would the vacuum of space have on the Apollo moon landings? NASA VACUUM CHAMBER - Why They Dont Test With Astronauts --Dave

Much to respond to here but one point at a time. The earth is rotating/moving The atmosphere is not "in" the earth. So why would the atmosphere be moving with it? The atmosphere is not "part" of the earth. --Dave

The flat earth was the original model of cosmology. It accounts for everything in the sky and the calendar. --Dave

I watched the videos and they challenged my notions. I was not flat earth and I'm still not at this point. --Dave

Even the majority of students in college did not take physics, or golf. --Dave

Ok, thanks. I will give this a good amount of time to study it. --Dave

Now you have put forth a testable argument that I can prove wrong. I am not weak minded and so I have falsified your argument that only the weak minded are fooled by flat earth videos. The physics of it all can be very difficult to grasp, but I am very aware that classical physics has been...

It takes 24 hours for the sun to circle a flat stationary earth. --Dave

Thank you. --Dave

I said it would not be a usual debate because the flat earth argument is made from video which is visible empirical evidence. It's not mainly theoretical. And that makes sense because it's about what we can handle feel and see. The problem with modern physics is it's almost all theoretical...

I think the possibility that the earth just might be flat and stationary and it might be true that we never went to the moon is what's got everyone all discombobulated. These tool's you offer are also questionable. The case for a globed cosmos seems very much a house of cards and contradiction...

Is there a "rant" website somewhere you could go to? This is a debate site, do you not comprehend the difference? --Dave

Your so kind, thank you for your concern. --Dave