Search results

Freelight even you do what this obscene book (which deserves its obscurity) doesn't do: you acknowledge Einstein as the author of your sig quote. As for your response to the plagiarism accusation, it is damnable nonsense. Listing the popular books from which the Sadlers got their scientific...

What I'd like to see is that you ACKNOWLEDGE the people who did the work. Then I'd like to see you appreciate the fact that this poor work of science fiction is WRONG about stuff that was discovered after 1955, and is WRONG about the age of the universe to the point where it quotes a joke...

Yes, discovered in the papers published by the scientists who sweated the hours and took the risks. You don't appear to have any shame at all about this blatant rip-off. Do you have any ethics? Do you care about the ones discovered by real human beings decades before your moronic book stole...

What a pair you two are. Apologists for burglary. Just remind you again: the discoverer of the structure of the atom was Lord Rutherford of Nelson. That is the name of the human whose brilliance and unparalleled abilities at scientific investigation FIRST showed us this fact. Your apologies...

Why not just post the who sorry urantia book of plagiarism into one big post. Then it would be done and we could move on to other things that are not both laughable like Scientology and immoral like common thievery. Stuart

In that case it is still wrong. Stuart

Caino (655.4) 57:4.8 6,000,000,000 years ago marks the end of the terminal breakup and the birth of your sun, the fifty-sixth from the last of the Andronover second solar family. This final eruption of the nebular nucleus gave birth to 136,702 suns, most of them solitary orbs. The total number...

Caino Just read that again and let it sink in. Maybe eventually you will see what a self-contradictory statement it is. No you didn’t. You don’t get Nobel Prizes in the sciences for proving things. That wouldn’t be science. You want me to bend language to breaking point to reinterpret poor...

Nothing should be considered sacred in science. The UB has set in concrete some ideas that are right and some that have been shown to be wrong. That is useless. Yes, the stuff that is wrong needs careful interpretation to save face. The main reason is that the authors of the Book of...

Have you got information that trumps Bohr and Schrodinger, or are you just waffling in a creationist kind of way? Stuart

Poor chemistry in the Book of Plagiarism (4): Not sure what the physics of Orvonton involves exactly, but in places that really exist, there is nothing special about the number 100 when it comes to the number of electrons around an atom. The highest naturally-occurring atomic number is...

Poor chemistry in the Book of Plagiarism (3): Our sun never had more than the tiniest trace amounts of calcium, and that calcium was not made in the sun but in other stars. The name of the person who first described the nucleogenesis of the heavier elements such as calcium was Fred Hoyle. Stuart

Poor chemistry in the Book of Plagiarism (2): The nineteenth and twentieth electrons of calcium actually share the same orbital. The names of the people who discovered and described atomic orbitals include Niels Bohr, Hantaro Nagaoka, Erwin Schrödinger and Robert Mulliken. Stuart

Poor chemistry in the Book of Plagiarism: Water is an effective fire extinguisher because it has a high heat capacity and does not react with oxygen. That is all you need to know to predict this property. Other chemicals have been synthesised from scratch specifically for this use: analysis...

Yes. If only we knew what those thoughts were! Stuart

The truest thing you ever wrote. Stuart

I think you can love Jesus and fight against christ. That seems to me to be the most ethical approach. Stuart

One Truth (although not the one you used to have, presumably: this is your second Truth now) Thank you for your pop-psychological analysis of me, which is only true about the animosity part. It is animosity to those who tell lies. Do you think that is unreasonable? The Judeo-christian...

You could just as validly call the lowest 10km of the atmosphere the "inner ionosphere", or indeed any layer you wanted, because ionising events happen at any altitude. What a load of tryhard nonsense. Stuart

OneTruth Maybe a lawsuit would have changed their minds. Science as it is conventionally done doesn’t seem to suffer for acclaiming the achievements of researchers. When you say involved in, you mean discovered for themselves without reference to a book that had not even yet been written, but...