Search results

The usual attempts to obscure. Your book has used the same words as a science writer, also modifying his phrases to something absurd in the process. It has evidently (on the evidence I presented) used the ideas of other scientists without permission or reference. That is DEFINED as...

Plagiarism is theft of intellectual property. You are defending a thief, or rather a committee of thieves. Stuart

No, it is exactly the same as yours. You just posted a link to the front page of an apology site for the UB. What point did you mean to make? Your replies are as ridiculous as this fatuous Book of Theft you defend. Its stealing and crackpottery are also yours. Stuart

How long is your nose now? Do you have difficulty fitting it into your house? Stuart

Which definition did the Sandler / Kellogg crackpots or you have in mind? No. 1 in regards to the natural claim on the intellectual origin of the science stolen by these nutcases? No. 3, which would have involved NAMING the scientists they were thanking? No, they acknowledge their Imaginary...

Here is a link that explains everything about why you are wrong. It is very similar in its nature to what you call ADDRESSING a point. http://www.google.com Stuart

They certainly do. No, you posted links without explaining what points you meant to make by doing so. Stuart

The No True Scotsman fallacy. To you, people would only be sound minded if they agreed that the repetition of an accusation was a good reason to discount it. But I persist because your answers each repetition are bogus, and do not address the central questions of the plagiarism and absurdity...

The page to which you linked said nothing of the sort. You are full of hot air and apology for theft, on this subject. Stuart

Your spirituality is based on science fiction which asserts wrong science and steals from the brilliant minds that have made your life into something quite different from the limited lives led by people of 100 years, or 500 years ago, or 1500 years ago when fatuous fantasy stories like the ones...

No! It's terrible to even suggest it! I do have some standards you know! I have read probably 60% of the UB. I gave up on it in the end because it was both absurd and dull at the same time. A few claim it is good sci-fi but I couldn't take it seriously enough to see any literary merit in it...

The heading you quoted promises acknowledgments, and yet it provides none. So how can you say it is not interested in such things when it also claims to acknowledge? Regarding the link you posted, could you be a bit more explicit please. What exactly are you claiming regarding the Book of...

Sorry but I did not see in this ACKNOWLEDGMENT the ACKNOWLEDGMENT of the NAMES of the ACTUALLY EXISTING HUMAN SCIENTISTS like RUTHERFORD or EINSTEIN who made the discoveries plagiarised in this book of plagiarism... ..which is what ACKNOWLEDGMENT actually means. Stuart

And what qualities are required to accept the findings of such comprehensive critiques when they demonstrate that the Urantia book is a work of plagiarism that attributes scientific work to supernatural beings and gets a substantial amount wrong because it copied outdated science? I'd say those...

Don't worry about reading what I wrote or anything, will you. Stuart

I would disagree with the well-written aspect. Self-consistency is not necessarily a good quality. At least I am not a common thief. Stuart

The UB is not thick enough to be even useful for standing on to reach books on the top shelf. Stuart

Caino Stuu: So which is it? Is science catching up with, or correcting the book? Once again, this time using English grammar and parsing? Where? Whose “truth”? A what? The Sadlers and perhaps a few of their crackpot friends who have read some science and maybe taken some drugs? The...

How do you "chart" things which are unknown? In this case it is simply thieving that which was already known and passing it off as the work of non-existent supernatural beings. Stuart

You could state facts without giving any reference to how those facts were established, and most people would be fine with that, including those who did the work. As soon as you start giving credit to anything for them WITHOUT acknowledging those who really did the work THEN you are entering...