Search results

Regarding the adulteress, who said that he who is without sin should cast the first stone? The one who is supposedly without sin. Did he cast any stones? No. So much for lucidity of logic and strength of reasoning. Stuart

Well indeed. So much for literal transubstantiation. Might other aspects of Catholicism also be fatuous bollocks, we wonder... The RCC doesn't accommodate preferences, I understand. Stuart

Yes, but why would the wafers need to be gluten free? Stuart

Can you explain why Catholic supplies shops have gluten-free wafers? Stuart

The RCC says that about everyone! But the William Sadler that wrote the urantia book, wasn't he ex-Seventh Day Adventist and a close associate (no less by marriage) of the fabulous crackpot John Harvey Kellogg? Stuart

Could you please tell me what verse that is in the UB. I've been looking for it. Thanks Stuart

Or the Wednesday, even. Stuart

In the Book of Plagiarism it says it was a Tuesday. Stuart

Apparently they don't need any kind of validation that the god experience is attributed correctly, either. A pulled hamstring is as much a sign from god as a sneeze or a hurricane. Love the avatar, by the way. Is it Homo sapiens idaltu? Stuart

Isn't half a pulse still a whole pulse? Stuart

These particular extraterrestrials have two things against them: 1. They were invented by a crackpot 2. Being as such, they don't actually exist That doesn't stop the gullible believing in Science Adjustors and Operating Thetans and Morons from Morontia. Stuart

According to non-canonical gospels, it was Mary Magdalene that did that.

You haven't got the faintest clue what you are talking about, have you. Not if you are an empiricist. It is pretty clear that there is unambiguous evidence that the brain is AT LEAST electrochemical in its nature, but there is NO unambiguous evidence that it is anything more than that...

I see you are optimistic that your own fantasy stories will find sympathy in science. The problem is that science slays gods of the gaps. Mystery is essential for the scientist and the religionist alike, but while the scientist sees it as a challenge to overcome, the religionist must see it as...

Rejoice in this glorious example from the Book of Plagiarism and Eugenics. Stuart

Pot, kettle, black. Stuart

You are welcome to ignore the immorality of the Book of Plagiarism. You do not share the shame of apologising for stealing. I'm quite satisfied with the results thanks. Stuart

57:6.2 The planets nearest the sun were the first to have their revolutions slowed down by tidal friction. Such gravitational influences also contribute to the stabilization of planetary orbits while acting as a brake on the rate of planetary-axial revolution, causing a planet to revolve ever...

It doesn't make perfect sense at all. What a load of wittering from the petty Science Adjustor Sadler, and I'm afraid from you too. Stuart

Good for you. I don't think there is any other way to read it. Mercury is presented as an example of a planet that only faces one side towards the sun, which was the prevailing idea when the UB was being written. It is a question of justice. We all either stand on the shoulders of giants...