Search results

If you actually know him and take his word for it then why did you not answer my questions to you concerning those things? Again, did you actually ask Chippy whether the sun path where he lives occurs in the northern sky or the southern sky from his vantage point? Everyone else but Chippy the...

No, the sun is not traveling in an arc south of Buenos Aires. The sun path across the sky is in the northern sky for Buenos Aires. Here it is again, and north and south are clearly labeled "N" and "S" on the graph: You are in denial: denying empirical evidence. More here:

Understand 1-M-1-S? You are incorrect by assuming that they are only telling you how to read the graph from Buenos Aires in the secondary link which you went to. In the secondary link they are in fact telling you how to read the sun path graph for any city you might be looking at on their...

You went to a different link within that link. E.g. vs. I.e.–What’s the Difference? https://www.grammarly.com/blog/know-your-latin-i-e-vs-e-g/

Why should I believe you when I can go right back to that link and find the graphic with ease: Therein is the map for 3/11/2018 which I copied and posted on another hosting site so that it would remain permanent just as I said in the edit in blue. Here is the same link with the current path of...

Did you ask Chippy if the path of the sun overhead is in the northern sky where he lives? Did you ask Chippy if he understands that people in the northern hemisphere see the sun passing overhead in the southern sky instead of the northern sky like he sees every day? Most people do not even think...

Lol, psychological warfare: anyone who believes what that guy is saying is automatically being mocked because they get their world view from a "purdy smart chipmunk". Moreover you still do not understand the argument, for if you did, you would never have even presented that video in rebuttal. If...

No problem, take your time, I'm in no hurry: but I should note here that the two image files of the sun paths for Portland Oregon and Buenos Aires appear to be date sensitive, (for today). So I do not know for sure whether or not they will still show up tomorrow in that post but the links will...

I was just getting ready to add this to my previous post and now am glad I did not. You can go to this site and check just about any city in the world, (whatever is on their list of course). I just chose these two off the top of my head. The following diagrams show the sun paths as viewed...

Okay, well enough. But do you agree on the physical observations of the paths of the sun?

Not sure a simple yes or no will suffice: here is what I am trying to say with the diagrams and video I provided, as stated in words by someone more qualified than myself to say this properly. Please pay particular attention to what is said in the final paragraph: The Sun from Different...

By the way, Dave, the arcs are somewhat exaggerated, (of course), but as for the final image file below: the arc to the south is only exaggerated as much as the supposed flat earth map itself. The two tropic lines, (circles), are actually circles of the same circumference on a globe: which shows...

I merely placed the sun on each line or arc to show its path across the sky as viewed from the earth in those three different locations. There is of course only one sun but there are three different perspectives from the planet because it is a spinning globe which is tilted on its axis of...

Here is a flat earth site which even goes so far as to show a model of the globe earth with the equator and the tropics on it, which are of course parallel lines because they encircle latitudes on a sphere. But what they apparently do not realize about the azimuthal globe earth map, which they...

This blogger discusses flight paths, (a little bit), in association with maps and at the same time also proves the same thing I have been saying herein: that the flat-earthers are for the most part unknowingly and unwittingly using a 2D azimuthal globe earth map to supposedly prove their...

Yes because essentially you do not realize that if you wish to give an accurate portrayal of what is actually witnessed from the ground you need to essentially superimpose this image over your flat earth map: Everything seems like it might be workable and okay so long as you focus only on the...

Lol, all you need to do now is look at the section around seven minutes and see, where he has the sun going in a circle, that he is incorrect about what people see in the southern hemisphere. In the southern hemisphere people witness the sun traversing the sky in an arc which does not match what...

Apparently you only accept the testimony of those who see what you see: but that is only one part of the world. It is not difficult to understand for anyone willing to understand. A person living in the northern latitudes will witness the sun moving across the sky in an arc over the southern sky...

You've already disallowed the physical observations of everyone else in the world by way of your own arguments against them. Only your observations are valid? Lol, of course, to you.

Post an image file of your preferred version of the flat earth map and I will try to explain why what I have said is true about it being a stretched out 2D map of a globe as viewed from above the north pole, (which is why Australia looks so out of proportion). You can even post an image with the...