Search results

Ripping verses out of context is a classic move of the confused. Shame on you.

...which have never before been pushed to be used as much as they have been in any pandemic previously where quarantining the sick and allowing the healthy to go about their lives as usual has been the standard for the past 3500 years... Tin-foil hat indeed.

Opinion polls are unreliable.

Once again, why do you care more about where information comes from than you do about the information itself? Genetic fallacy, and especially here, poisoning the well and ad hominem against Breitbart. Attack the argument, not the people making it.

Because you say so?

Because you say so? Rather, it just means before the baby in the womb has developed at all. Meaning, "immediately after conception" is not excluded, all the way up to the point where a form takes shape (which is, as I understand it, several weeks afterwards) Appeal to popularity is a logical...

https://theweeklyworldview.com/bob-and-doug-co-host-bob-enyart-live/ Links on the show page that are not present in this post can be found at the link above. Bob and Doug Co-host Bob Enyart Live Posted on May 27, 2021 Here’s a bonus show from AM 670 KLTT radio Denver Colorado...

Says the one quoting from "the natural" fairy tale book...

Yeah, you are. No. The new covenant has been put on hold, as per Paul, and Acts. This is an ad hominem. It's a logical fallacy. Address my arguments or don't, but don't attack me.

Repents towards God and asks for forgiveness. False. Mixing dispensations is a cult classic, and only results in confusion, as you have thus demonstrated.

You answered a question I did not ask. No, it's because what you believe is, in fact, a fairy tale. No, he's not. If so, SO WHAT? Was what he said false? It's not strange at all. Because it's all for ABRAHAM'S SAKE! Nonsense.

Here it is again:

If you believed scripture, then you would have no problem showing me how what I said in post #139 was incorrect. Instead, you chose to ignore it all and claim I'm incorrect. As I showed in post #139, your interpretation of 1 Corinthians 1:18 is absurd.

Saying it doesn't make it so, B57. I showed you how you were wrong, and you come back with a one-liner as if that refutes what I said. Go back and read what I wrote again, and try to refute it, rather than making baseless statements.

And they are welcome to share those beliefs. But Mark here has, by posting on this forum, clarified enough that He is, at least as far as I can tell, a Christian. Asking him if he's a Muslim, when you know that he's a Christian, or at the very least has Christian beliefs, is trolling. No. That...

My health is none of your concern, thanks!

It's not a specific chapter and verse. It's an observation made by getting an overview of the Bible.

Angels are not physical beings, and they do not currently manifest themselves in physical forms (as per scripture). I just gave you two STRONG pieces of evidence that aliens don't exist. Are you going to ignore them?

You realize there's 9 months between conception and birth, right? God can look at a just-fertilized human embryo and know everything about that person. That's present knowledge, not future. Then all He has to do is to set him apart (definition of sanctify) for a task. It's not hard at all...

There is. It's called the Bible, and science. Christ died ONCE for MANKIND. He didn't die for ET. And the earth, solar system, and galaxy we live in is, for all practical purposes, in the center of the universe, we are the focus of His attention. That's two STRONG witnesses. Two or three...