Search results

No, it's not. There were plenty of sheep throughout scripture who perished. Thus, we know that your claim here is wrong, because scripture isn't. Jesus is talking specifically about His disciples. Again, SPECIFICALLY talking about His disciples. Changing scripture to match your beliefs...

LYING IS A SIN. Otherwise, point out where you replied to those posts. Supra.

https://theweeklyworldview.com/the-silk-curtain/ Links to the stories mentioned here that are not present in this post can be found at the link above. The Silk Curtain Posted on May 31, 2021 Listen to America’s most attractive audio engineer and her host as the document the tragic murder...

Bearing false witness is a sin, B57. You should repent. And then respond to my and other's posts, particularly posts 22, 24, 25, 27, 28, and 30.

Says the one who has ignored everything we"ve said so far in this thread and is continuing to post as if no one has said a word. And you're not explaining anything, let alone posting truth... Hypocrite!

There you go ignoring all of the points that have been made to you again, because you don't have a good answer to them. That's because there isn't any. You cannot defend your beliefs because they are not supported by scripture. You should acknowledge that fact and repent, instead of hardening...

The Lord has made all for Himself, Yes, even the wicked for the day of doom. - Proverbs 16:4 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Proverbs16:4&version=NKJV Who is it that's made for destruction? Is it the wicked person? Or is it a person who doesn't exist yet or who hasn't become wicked...

His sister.

Yes. There will be those who perish, because they did not repent. It won't be because God made them for perishing, nor will it be because God predestined them to damnation for His pleasure (which is contra-scripture). Whether they perish or not has little to do with God's desire for them to...

Repeating your fallacy won't make me respond to it. God's objective was to provide reconciliation to men. God completed his objective of providing a means for people to be reconciled to Him. He did so on the cross, because He is not willing, He does not desire, for any to perish.

The word used in 2 Peter 3:9 is boulomai. Strong's g1014 - Lexical: βούλομαι - Transliteration: boulomai - Part of Speech: Verb - Phonetic Spelling: boo'-lom-ahee - Definition: to will, intend, desire, wish. - Origin: Middle voice of a primary verb; to "will," i.e. (reflexively) be willing. -...

If you do not use the quote function on this site, I WILL NOT be notified of your reply to my post. No, it doesn't. And you're the arbiter who decides if someone has "received" something? Yeah, right. And yet, all you can do is whine and act all offended. You can't show me how I'm wrong...

Yes, and?

No, you don't. The Son of Man is not the spirit of truth. Christ never returned when He said He would. Pentecost wasn't the due date for His return. Why do you think that failed prophecies are a problem for us? Yes, and?

1) My claim was not "God can protect His own written word". It was "God can write a book in such a way that it can survive a few errors being introduced into it and still retain its original message." 2) Moses smashing of the tablets in no way invalidates my above claim, as no errors were...

Saying it doesn't make it so. Yet another instance of ripping a verse out of context. Don't be a troll, Nanja.

Yes, God can use even His broken creation to accomplish a task. No exaggeration at all. Such books never existed to begin with. Well, no. They didn't. God's prophets did. Are you asserting that He didn't favor Israel? More fairy tale. This is AFTER Paul's conversion, after the...

They never disappeared to begin with. The tablets may have broken, but the commandments did not go away. Where's your proof? So what? The commandments themselves were not broken by Moses. Or what, do you think that just because a couple of stone tablets were broken, therefore the laws...

His objective was to provide a means of reconciliation for mankind. So yes, He accomplished that goal on the cross. He made the first move, now man has to respond, when he hears the message of the good news, either by believing, or by rejecting it.

No, it doesn't. Who is the "we" highlighted above? Is it people who have yet to believe? or is it people who already believe? I tell you, it's the latter! Who is it upon, B57? Is it on those who have yet to believe? or those who already believe? Supra. Who's living it? Paul. Not God...