Search results

I'm very glad you've brought up Aristotle and Plato because it gives me an opportunity to make one of my recent points in a way that I'm hoping will reach you. You and I reject the doctrine of Immutability and other related doctrines. We often make arguments that have to do with the fact that...

All of which have been refuted on this thread. Well, not "ALL"! There seems to be an infinite number is irrationalities these folks can come up with. That one video has two hundred arguments that are all 100% wrong! I don't even know how you pull that off! I mean how can you make 200 false...

I cannot believe that you are really this incapable of following my argument. I didn't say that you were actually calling his geometry into question! You are not making the argument that you appearant think your are making. You are saying his cosmology is wrong but the only reason you gave for...

Excellent point! Why not say that the Earth isn't actually here at all? I've seen some suggest that the moon doesn't exist. That it's a hologram or something. They cite the fact that there are no photographs of the moon prior to 1950 or something as proof. Never mind the countless paintings...

From what I've read, and I'm sure there is varied opinions on this but basically their point is that the only explanation for the Earth, as it exists (i.e. flat) is God. In other words, they not only don't need to explain the mechanics of it, the lack of explanation is the point! If the world is...

Do you see what I mean! This is a bunch of crap, David! You begged me to debate this. BEGGED ME! So I do and you flatly IGNORE arguments that take me hours to write up and to edit. Rather than responding to arguments, all you do is find more horse manure to present that I'm supposed to spend...

Dave, you've gotta start reading more carefully. I didn't make that argument, YOU DID! Your argument was basically that because Pythagoras was a pagan, his cosmology is false. But you made no rational connection between the premise (paganism) and the conclusion (false cosmology). Therefore, the...

I've been, reluctantly, reading some flat Earth nonsense (sorry, there's just not any other word for it) on various websites and I've come to the conclusion that the entire idea is indeed Satanic, or at the very least, demonic. And I'm 100% not kidding about that. Here's the best example of...

So what's the form of your argument here? Pythagoras was a pagan therefore everything he said was false and everything everyone said that can be at all linked to him is also false. Are you intentionally calling into question the validity of the pythagorian theorum or was that just an...

I am a rational being, that's who. I can decide what is and is not a rational worldview that same way I decide that anything else is rational, by reason. That which is not verifiable is not science, Dave. I'm not I understand the point you're making here. Are you equating the fact that the...

Dave, You are not responding to the arguments presented. All you do is present more lunacy that needs to be refuted which you then ignore (mostly) and add even more lunacy. There is a name for this technique. It's called muddying the water. People with rational worldviews don't need such...

Allow you to continue to think that evolution is observable.

You think I'm stupid. That puts me at the advantage.

Ridiculous.

As this website proves multiple times a day, saying it doesn't make it so. Evolutionists can say anything they want. It doesn't make it true nor even scientific. There are actually several environmental factors that have been shown to be able to affect DNA. It does not create it but that...

The force of gravity (F) between two masses is equal to the gravitational constant (G) times the mass of both bodies divided by the square of the distance between the two bodies. From Wikipedia... In modern language, the law states: Every point mass attracts every single other point mass by a...

I despise the term 'microevolution' but otherwise, this statement is true and can be easily observed. This statement is only true in the fact that it accurately describes the concept of macroevolution. Macroevolution not only has not been observed, it cannot be observed and is therefore not...

No one has suggested that an analogy proves anything. It doesn't change the fact that the analogy is perfect. No, it doesn't. I've already directly addressed this. The mechanism holding the atmosphere to the Earth is the exact same mechanism that is holding you to the Earth. GRAVITY The fact...

A short Dandelion weed is not a hybrid version of a tall one. It's simply a different expression of the Dandelion weed's genetic code. And yet, in spite of not being a "hybrid", the shorter one's have a survival advantage in my front yard because there are these crazy humans that come along with...

Nope! It is not "absolutely" true. It is relatively true. For what feels like the 50th time. Motion of an object is only meaningful RELATIVE to another object. So your brother's face is motionless RELATIVE to the car. It is still moving relative to the road on which the car is driving. Since the...