Search results

I think Nero COULD have been THE Antichrist, had God decided to come back before 70 A.D. But since He didn't, he wasn't.

An appeal to incredulity is a logical fallacy. Do you think that only secular people should have a say in how their government acts? If not, then "separation of church and state" is just words. If so, however, then your government is guaranteed to break down much quicker.

https://www.versebyverseministry.org/bible-answers/why-is-the-tribe-of-dan-missing-in-revelation-7

Man goes to hell for the sins that their Creator predestined them to do, according to your position. That puts GOD at fault for their going to hell. And he condemns men in injustice, according to your position.

Yet you put the blame squarely on Him, by saying that He chooses some to be saved but not others. Again: What better excuse can you give an unbeliever for his refusal to believe than "My Creator never chose me to be saved"? This is talking about the right to do what one wants with his own...

Also: It's "Sars-CoV-2".

Because we should totally believe everything China says...

No, it's not. And your "explanations" contradict plain scripture, which NEVER puts belief after salvation.

Actually, there is. Deadly negligence is a crime. “When you build a new house, then you shall make a parapet for your roof, that you may not bring guilt of bloodshed on your household if anyone falls from it. - Deuteronomy 22:8...

Yes, people like you. ... mock people like you. Why do you assume that Satan was flung to earth? Sounds like a serious case of begging the question to me. Which supports MY view. Not yours. Sounds like Genesis 3:19... Yeah, you're truly hilarious. So is what you believe. I think...

This is putting the cart before the horse. Scripture says the reverse of what you say.

You're the one asserting that "God just didn't choose them." so who else should be blamed according to your position? What better excuse does the unbeliever have than "God didn't love me enough to choose me" according to your position? By saying that, you call Paul's words into question, or...

Hypocrite.

Which doesn't inherently make us ultra-dispensationalists. Or can't you take us at our word when we say "We're not ultra-dispensationalists"? As mentioned before: The ENTIRE BIBLE is FOR everyone, regardless of Jew or Gentile. However, some parts of the Bible are written TO specific groups...

People like you say the darndest things... :LOL::ROFLMAO::LOL::ROFLMAO::LOL::ROFLMAO::LOL:

Me thinks you aren't contributing anything to the thread with this kind of post.

Saying it doesn't make it so. I quoted scripture. You have mere assertion. Wrong. His rising from the dead shows His power. His willingness to die on the cross shows us His love. His death reconciled the entire world to Himself, and His life saves those who call upon Him. That's what...

False. "We shall be saved by His LIFE" Romans 5:10 Scripture cannot be more clear. Wrong. For “whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved.” - Romans 10:13 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans10:13&version=NKJV Scripture cannot be more clear. In mercy and truth...

That's not how "discussion" works. As Clete mentioned earlier, taking the discussion in a direction that the OP of the thread wasn't expecting is not against the rules. In fact, it can be far more fruitful (not to mention fun) than expecting everyone to just simply go along with the flow of...

Do you have a mouse in your pocket or something? Debatable. No, it wasn't. Not sufficiently. And certainly not by "historical fact." See Clete's post.