Search results

There were no "oceans" prior to the Flood. Only seas. At that timestamp you'll have a basic idea of what it looked like. Certainly not a voyage that any normal ship of that age could make. And Noah had at least 75 years to work on his.

Not likely. No vessel other than Noah's would have been able to survive the flood.

I doubt anyone survived that was not on the Ark. The Bible is pretty clear that everything that "all flesh died that moved on the earth," listing birds, cattle, beasts, every creeping thing, and every man, and it even emphasizes "all in whose nostrils was the breath of the spirit of life, all...

A system could be put in place, but it would eventually become corrupted and usurp the king. All it would take is for that "super-majority" to be (or become) corrupt for it to destroy the proposed system. Here's why: Let's say you have an evil king, and there was some, as you call it...

👍 Fair enough. That's reasonable. The problem is that there's no earthly solution to it. As I recall, Bob fully acknowledged that any system put in place by humans or that has humans as an inherent part in it will have flaws in it, simply because humanity is flawed. With that in mind...

The flood began around 3290 ± 100 B.C, around 5300 ± 100 years ago. This page and the next 3 (just click the "Next Page" button to get to them) explain. http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/FAQ210.html#wp19593608

A little over a day.

Then as far as I can tell, Clete agrees with you, at least on this point.

Are chapters 9-11 written to/for the Body of Christ?

Start a new thread, please.

Alright, let's see if I can jump back into this... I agree, but I was mostly referring to humanity in general, not the Body of Christ. I think you're forgetting one crucial detail regarding the proposed constitution. That it seeks to codify the moral laws ("do not steal, do not murder, do...

Like I said, you're in denial. Not sure. The Bible outright condemn ANY sexual activity outside of marriage. That includes pedophilia. The source of some information has very little to nothing to do the content. Dismissing the content because of the source is called a genetic fallacy.

Too bad. You were shown what you asked for, and now you're denying the evidence. Amazon (still, as of today) selling a book promoting pedophilia is not "a brief instance mistakenly defending pedophilia. Most of those are from this century. Seems like you didn't bother reading most of them.

Here's a list: https://kgov.com/list-of-liberals-who-support-pedophiles

https://theweeklyworldview.com/big-dumb/ Links to the stories mentioned here that are not present in this post can be found at the link above. Big Dumb Posted on March 13, 2022 Listen in as America’s most attractive audio engineer and her host bring you another World War and the collapse of...

https://theweeklyworldview.com/arrogance-of-corruption/ Links to the stories mentioned here that are not present in this post can be found at the link above. Arrogance of Corruption Posted on March 6, 2022 Join America’s most attractive audio engineer as she and her host walk the minefields of...

Maybe if you would get your head out of the sands of calvinism, you'd be able to.

Hello, Welcome to our forum!

Alright, hold up, you two. It seems both of you are talking past each other. Glory, you said: Which says that Clete denies that Romans 9-11 are ABOUT, not TO, Israel. Yet Clete clearly stated: Am I missing something here? Or are you both getting worked up over a simple miscommunication?

No, it would be from greater than 50% to 5%. The income of the average citizen would literally double. Yes, it would require getting rid of all the stuff that the government does that is not its responsibility, which is ONLY infrastructure and criminal justice (both foreign and domestic)...