Search results

Yes, He did. Yes, but it wasn't fiction that He inspired. It was a record of the literal history of the universe, because aside from Adam, who was only present on the last day of the universe's (including everything within it) creation, and the angels (who were there from around day 2, but...

Hate to say it, BB, but don't give the left any ideas... People are too dumb and might actually believe it.

So you don't even know what it's about and can't easily tell me, despite being an avid supporter of it? Or you do know and because my prediction was accurate, despite me having never read it, you would rather be petty about it and tell me to read it instead of telling me yourself, despite you...

I'm talking about for EITHER President. For ANY president. For ANY leader of a nation. That tends to happen when a republican candidate has to deal with the previous president's democratic initiatives, especially when he had been in office for the last 8 years.... Were you trying to say...

4-8 years isn't nearly enough time to fix America. Oh great, a bunch of socialist programs...

Did you mean to say here "When science fails...."? We're asking you to consider the evidence for the Bible. We also discuss facts and evidence. Opinions are a dime a dozen. Rather, your claims are the result of looking at secular dogma. In other words, it's not science. Speak for...

Nope. It is, in fact, direct evidence of a flood. Because it is. And those "works and studies" are wrong, because they assume millions of years, rather than starting with the evidence and following it wherever it leads. False. You're the one making the claim, therefore the onus is on you...

I'm talking about when the Flood occurred, which would have laid down MOST of the sedimentary rock we see today that evolutionists claim was laid down by millions of years. THAT was ~5300 years ago, NOT 3500 years ago.

False.

Yes, I'm sure. No, it doesn't. Nope. That's simply a very poor translation of what the verse says. Here's what it actually says: and swore by Him who lives forever and ever, who created heaven and the things that are in it, the earth and the things that are in it, and the sea and the...

3500 years ago is around the time of Moses. Definitely wasn't a flood at that point in time. It matters. Don't let blueboy trick you into conceding the argument by using his standards instead of the Bible's.

Care to write something that ACTUALLY makes sense? Time doesn't have a beginning. The verse doesn't say "before time began." It says "before the world began." Huge difference. Nope, sorry. None of these passages say what you want them to say.

5300 years, not 3500 years. The flood occurred around 3290 BC (give or take 100 years).

So start listening: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLpl6E8stJTiIi8wdLgYj1eXpp-4o1UUkZ You're not doing a very good job. Jesus spoke more about Hell and what happens to those who reject Him than the Old Testament ever did. Also, Revelation is in the New Testament. Sure it was. If...

No, he didn't do that. He contrasted works with faith. That means that faith is not a work.

No, we're not. New-age nonsense. Take scripture at its word, THEN you can go deeper. RD addressed this sufficiently already. Yes. That's called idolatry. Says the one saying the Bible shouldn't be taken literally... And the former are wrong in their beliefs. No one is worshipping...

It amounts to rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. If parents educated their children to begin with, the teacher wouldn't have ever needed to deal with something like this in the first place. If homosexuality was a crime (because it is according to God, and has been for the past 3500...

Something else to consider is this: https://kgov.com/targeted-antibody-cancer-treatment-revolution https://kgov.com/immune-system-intentional-targeting-of-pathogens

"Usage" is just a record of how it's been used. That's fair... I mean, to me, Herod imprisoning someone for over a year who was the friend of someone he just killed sounds like a very Herod thing to do. However, I did do a little more research on this just now, and it does not seem like...

Are you sure it's the NKJV that's incorrect and not the KJV? Strong's Concordance shows the following for the word used: Strong's g3957 - Lexical: πάσχα - Transliteration: pascha - Part of Speech: Aramaic Transliterated Word (Indeclinable) - Phonetic Spelling: pas'-khah - Definition: the...