Search results

Anyone who decided to go along with this should be executed for promoting the sexualization of children.

I'll do you one better: Want to eliminate the prison population? Bring back restitution, corporal punishments, and the death penalty, and execute all of the current death row inmates, and then get rid of the prison system. This can be done without a prison system. Supra. Can be done...

Because it was. Saying it doesn't make it so.

Notice how that was spoken by Jesus to the Jews just a few chapters before He said to the Gentile woman "I have not come except for the lost sheep of the House of Israel."

What I said above isn't a matter of opinion. It's a matter of what the Bible ACTUALLY SAYS! My opinions (not what I posted above), are based on what it actually says. What are yours based on, but your a priori beliefs that Christians cannot sin.

http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/FAQ212.html

As I said above, condemning someone for judging you is hypocritical. People like you are not a challenge at all. Pointing out the flaws in your argumentation is not "unloading." Meaningless nonsense. The flood is an event that did, in fact, occur. And a total of 150 days of water on the...

Mine is the God of the Bible. Who is your god? And five chapters later He said, "I was not sent except to the lost sheep of the house of Israel." Enduring to the end is in context of keeping the law. Paul, on the other hand says if you keep the law, you're cursed. For as many as are of the...

Funny how the only thing you respond to of mine is a short post directed at your hypocrisy, and not a long one addressing your arguments.

And you're judging him for judging you. Doesn't that make you a hypocrite?

False. False. I'm not. Again, repenting means to change one's mind. That's the entire point. Changing one's mind, repenting, does not make one incapable of sinning. That wasn't an opinion. Not what I said. Becoming a new creature doesn't mean we won't stumble. Reborn is a term that...

Anyways, @Yorzhik, my point is that saying the flood was "about 4000 years ago" isn't close enough to the actual date of the Flood to be able to say that it was "about 4000 years ago." And so, the claim, even though it's an estimate, is wrong.

In other words, Abraham would NOT have been able to talk to Shem, as @Yorzhik claimed, because Shem would died around and at least before 2700 BC, and Abraham was born no earlier than 2300 BC.

Abraham lived around 2200 BC. The Flood occurred around 3290 BC (±100 years). You're telling me Shem lived about 1000 years? Not even close.

Child abuse.

How about Child Abuse?

It's actually old, about 7500 years (give or take 100 years) old! 4000 years ago is around the time of Abraham, not the flood.

Take it from someone who's not you: No, it's not what you're doing. Maybe what you know to be true is actually wrong. Considered that yet? Then your knowledge is in error, because he was, in fact, the first human. So what? DNA evidence points to Mitochondrial Eve (likely Eve herself), and...

That's what I've been doing. The difference is mine isn't an opinion. It's fact. Thank you for conceding the discussion. No. Humans aren't capable of fully turning from sin, not in this life. We still have to deal with our flesh, which is constantly pulling us away from Christ. Add to...

I can see you aren't going to bother to lift a finger to just tell me what it is that you support in any level of detail. You'd rather hide behind a bill that likely has nothing to do with what it actually implies. It's literally just about that easy.