Search results

I have no idea what in the world you're talking about. Is that all it takes to make you disappear and stop wasting everyone's time? Your post was an INTENTIONAL insult that you KNEW wasn't true when you stated it! Then you get your feelings hurt when I call you the liar that you are and start...

You are such a buffoonish waste of time! Why do you even bother coming here? If you cannot articulate WHY you believe what you believe then you are literally wasting both your time and everyone else's you interact with here!

That isn't proof. It is SOMETHING of an argument at least but it is by no means proof. All you've really said here is that you discard Calvin's doctrine, which any third grader is smart enough to do instinctively. The fact that we are able to respond to the gospel would only be proof that we...

I'd be very much surprised if you were. Unlike what you imply with this idiotic statement, I don't do it for your sake.

Well, once again, I have to start a post with... Saying it doesn't make it so! Bob's argument never suggests anything similar to "time does not require motion or change to be measured", in fact, I know for certain that Bob would have absolutely agreed that time requires change and so the...

Where are that actual arguments you make? All I see here is one bald personal opinion after another.

Liar. You know better! Again, remember, the whole thread is still right here where the whole world has access to it!

Asked and answered. One more itteration of this will land you on my ignore list.

No you don't! 99 & 44/100% of what you do is to flatly state what you believe, not why you believe it. And then when pressed to explain the "why", you call the questions asked in that direction, "stupid". See, here's a great example of you doing exactly that... I told you in advance, one might...

Okay, none of that made any sense whatsoever. Try again.

Easy? Perhaps not. It is, however, that simple.

Once again, you should read the posts that are written to you before saying stupid things. I responded directly and in context to the specific passage that you quoted. I cited credible sources that you have no basis to even question, never mind refute. King James Onlyism is utterly stupid...

:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO: Why don't you actually read posts before saying things like this that make you look like a literal buffoon? I mean, seriously!

Wish granted!

If the odds of practically ANY biological system you care to name forming by mindless, undirected natural processes were only 1 in 300,000,000 you'd have a point, but the odds aren't even close to being that good! Not even remotely close! In fact, there are no odds. It is not unlikely, it is...

You have to actually read my posts, fool. Both arguments presented with full to the brim with scripture. It isn't my fault that you're too lazy to bother reading them. Here, I'll post them again just so as to remove any excuse you might want to employ about not being able to find them... Proof...

I wasn't wrong. At most we were talking past one another and all you're doing now is asking me to REPEAT myself! It seems all you're interested in is wasting my time. And I will post in any thread I desire to post in whether you like what I have to say or not.

None of this refutes a single syllable of what I've now repeatedly argued. Clete

No, I wont.

Then why don't you make actual arguments instead of simply stating your doctrine? If it isn't true then prove it! All you have to do is answer the question in a manner that is consistent with your doctrine! Forgot the question? Here it is again... Do you suppose God would have broken had...