Search results

A belief. That's all it is. You believe it in opposition to any evidence to the contrary that is presented to you.

You're a fool. If you're okay with twisting plainly stated verses of scripture to mean anything other than what they explicitly state then why bother with the bible at all, much less debating it! Just believe what you want to believe and drop the pretense! Welcome to my ignore list. Good bye.

It's worse that slightly outdated. It's difficult to read and follow even for people, like myself, who have been a Christian their entire lives. I can't imagine the effort that an uninitiated person would have to put into reading it. Here's something I just pulled out at random from the KJV...

You were the one who said that we are all suffering from a curse due to Adam's sin, or something along those lines. Basically, you're here defending the doctrine of original sin, which is a disgusting doctrine that is not biblical and that is an insult to the God who is Himself the very...

This sentence makes no sense! Who cares what you think logic should do? Logic, performed correctly, leads where it leads. Truth is that which is consistent with reality. Any claim is either true or it is false and logic is THE ONLY MEANS we have to determine whether any particular claim is or is...

Okay, remove the word "completely".

Prove it. This notion is a common Christian belief but I see no evidence for it in scripture. There no evidence that animals didn't eat other animals nor is there any evidence that animals were intended to be immortal. And, if Adam and Eve were created immortal, then what was the idea behind...

That's your doctrine but the bible explicitly says otherwise. Hebrews 6:4 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted the heavenly gift, and have become partakers of the Holy Spirit, 5 and have tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come, 6 if...

Babies do not die because they are guilty of any sin - especially Adam's!

I've not read this entire thread but what I have read seems to show that those who are arguing against Right Divider are commonly making the mistake of evaluating a biblical system of justice from within the context of our current society. This is a huge mistake and all of the objections having...

What I refuse to acknowledge is the implication that there is some moral responsibility for Adam's sin that we've inherited from him. That is NOT true! By your logic, every baby that's been chopped alive into pieces by the abortionists DESERVED what they got! Worse than that, you believe that...

Hebrews 6:4 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted the heavenly gift, and have become partakers of the Holy Spirit, 5 and have tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come, 6 if they fall away, to renew them again to repentance, since they...

Liar. If you had anything, a whole herd of wild horses couldn't keep you from posting it.

If Ezekiel 18 is the truth then your examples are moot, as is your entire position and argument. No, it would not have been. God DOES NOT execute babies because of Adam's sin! So says God Himself through His profit Ezekiel, not to mention the Apostle Paul (Romans 5). How so? I dare you to...

The phrase "knowledge of good and evil" is not talking about what you know or don't know in your mind. It is a euphemism. It is a reference to the law. For a person to "have no knowledge of good and evil" simply means that the law is not being applied to that person. I will spend ZERO effort...

Irrelevant. There is exactly nothing you can say that even begins to overcome the fact that the English language has changed to a degree that makes the KJV completely outdated and obsolete.

No, and even if it were true, it would not to be to any extent that begins to overcome the fact that the English language has changed to a degree that makes the KJV completely outdated and obsolete.

Marke is a fool. Ignore anything he says about babies sinning from the moment of their birth. He believes his doctrine, not the bible.

Not true and even if it were, it would not to be to any extent that begins to overcome the fact that the English language has changed to a degree that makes the KJV completely outdated and obsolete. A point, by the way, that you completely ignored and will continue to ignore because if there is...

Always has been!