Search results

That's nonsense! You're a conspiracy theorist. No reasoning with you. Believe whatever you want! It makes no difference whether it makes and sense or not! What in the world are you doing here?

The NIV doesn't omit verses "whenever they feel like it"! You see! This is the sort of nonsense I always see from you KJV only morons! There's no reasoning behind it at all. It's just so much hysteria and stupidity. The NIV omits verse 37 from Acts 8 because the texts that the people who...

I answered that question directly. Sin changed their bodies, not God. The ways in which God changed Eve's body had to do with extending the time of gestation so that new born babies would better survive in the world outside of Eden. Asked and answered.

No it does not make any such claim! Here's a direct quote from the footnote on page 1393 of my own hard copy of the New King James.... "Verses 9-20 are not found in the two most ancient manuscripts, the Sinaiticus and Vaticanus; others have them with partial omissions and variations. But the...

What are you talking about? The King James and the New King James have the exact same number of verses in Mark 16. As does the ASV, ESV, the RSV and at least the online version of the NIV, as well as every other version I've checked! Golly! It sure seems like the word's gotten out in spite of...

Can you give ANY evidence that normal people wrote Greek without vowels? No, you can't. That's why you ignore the point. By the way, there was no such thing as punctuation at all in ancient Greek, nor did they leave spaces between words. They did, however, have vowels and would have used them...

Most Christians don't even know that such a system exists and non-Christians don't believe God came up with anything in the first place. Both sets of people have lived in a society that has forgotten what justice looks like for over two centuries now. They're jaded to the point that having a...

A failure to rightly divide leads to a failure to judge rightly! I can tell you that I'd be proud to be mixed up with either of you guys!

I think it's clear enough as it is. No matter how its worded, those who want to pick nits will do so.

We are too far apart here. Why did I "jump" to Romans 7? Romans 7 isn't but a couple of pages away from Romans 5. It's not exactly a big jump! Romans 7:9 I was alive once without the law, but when the commandment came, sin revived and I died. ...which is true because.... Romans 5:18...

Do you really believe that Peter, James, John, Luke, Paul and Jude would have written letters to their friends and colleagues in a language that had vowels and punctuation but just chose not to use them? Why would he have done that? No! They obviously would not have done that. The removal of...

The list uses the word to mean what it means. I will not let you reframe my list into some sort of endorsement of a pet doctrine of yours. It was not a commentary on the nature of Hell but on the condemnation of one's soul. At the very least the death I'm talking about is a permanent separation...

No it wouldn't. Give me one good example of the sort of corruption you're talking about.

The ground may be "cursed" but I am not.

Corrupted how? How many times must you be asked this question? What does it do to the text? Do you even know?

I put you on ignore yesterday. I'm taking you off ignore today. I realized that you've not done anything worthy of being put in that company. You're stubborn and lazy but not a complete idiot or blasphemous like most of those on my ignore list. I just have to get used to the fact that you...

Absolutely brilliant! Well done!

Yeah, okay. I don't disagree with you there except that my comments were made in the context of just normal folks doing normal bible reading and preaching sermons to regular folks. If your using the KJV for some scholarly purpose such as the study of the English language in the 17th century or a...

We are NOT under a curse any longer! But it does make it easier to identify and harder for people to sneak around defending it without calling attention to what it is they're actually defending. It is only the dishonest who dislike labels. That doctrine has NOTHING to do with "original sin"...

I doubt that it would have bothered me. I wouldn't have had any exposure to anything else because it was a common practice at the time because copies had to be made by hand and the practice also allowed for better copy error detection. Also, any manuscripts that had no vowels or punctuation...