Search results

Treating the symptoms will not fix the root problem. Guess where all of them come from: the three main branches of government.

The Supreme Court is not supreme, nor does it make good judgements.

The President of the United States does not lead.

https://kgov.com/bel/20111122

What am I missing? The Department of Justice does not care about justice. The Federal Bureau of Investigation does not investigate. The Department of Homeland Security does not secure our homeland. The Department of Transportation has made traveling a nightmare. The Border Czar (Kamala) has...

Been seeing that lately. What a tragedy. But that's "the way that leads to death" that is the result of sin.

So Jesus was lying when He said, "I am not come except for the lost sheep of the house of Israel? The settled view strikes again. Sorry, but I'm an open theist. I don't believe God knows the future. Thus, He couldn't have known whether she was going to be persistent in her faith, especially...

Denying reality isn't healthy, Arthur. Once again, no. He didn't. As stated before: Jesus insulted her because He was trying to get her to go away, because as He stated quite clearly: "It is not good to take the children's bread and feed it to the little dogs." Again: The children...

I did that. I didn't see anything wrong with it. Saying it doesn't make it so.

Apparently I do, because you CLEARLY do not understand how figures of speech work.

Saying it doesn't make it so.

It "doesn't occur to me" because that is not at all what he was doing... As Scripture is clear. In other words, you've decided that He said what you believe He said, and you're not willing to consider any other position no matter what.

Saying it doesn't make it so, and you refuse to demonstrate the claim.

He said as much. First He ignored her. Then He said to his disciples, "I am not sent except to the lost sheep of the house of Israel." Then He said to her, "It is not good to take the children's bread and throw it to the little dogs." Why is that so hard for you to understand? Says the one...

When you say that "I'm mad enough to shoot you," but it's a figure of speech, then OF COURSE it doesn't actually mean that you're going to shoot someone. It just means you're mad enough to do it! It means EXACTLY WHAT IT SAYS! I did so in BOTH. "I'm mad enough to shoot you" does not mean...

It is if it's false. And last I checked, TGP is not "thoroughly discredited" nor a "rag." Wikipedia is one witness. One witness is not enough to establish a matter. Then quit complaining about it.

What part of "The figure of speech "the words are still in one's mouth" means that the person is still uttering the words" makes you think that I do not see it as a figure of speech?

First you have to establish that God did not, in fact, call her a "doggette." Scripture says: Then Jesus went out from there and departed to the region of Tyre and Sidon. And behold, a woman of Canaan came from that region and cried out to Him, saying, “Have mercy on me, O Lord, Son of...

And yet, I, who has discernment, cannot "see right through it," whatever you think "it" is. Do they have an odd way of looking at things? Perhaps. But "total rubbish" their site is not. No, it's not. That you seem unable to provide. If you think posting a wikipedia link is sufficient...