Search results

So Paul was lying? Now to Him who is able to establish you according to my gospel and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery kept secret since the world began but now made manifest, and by the prophetic Scriptures made known to all nations, according to the...

I like this idea.

This reminded me of a couple of recent Kgov shows... https://kgov.com/bel/20220729 https://kgov.com/bel/20220805

The Small Business Administration undermines small businesses and makes it difficult for them to flourish.

So it doesn't condemn healing on the Sabbath? In other words, there was no law against healing? REMINDER: You said: You said that "everyone who followed Jesus saw the end of the Law." I quoted Acts 15:1 which showed you that everyone who followed Jesus did NOT see the end of the Law...

Where does the Law condemn healing on the Sabbath? Remember, violating the Sabbath was punishable by the death penalty, according to the law. However, God expected His people to intentionally break the Law in certain circumstances when it was called for. Go read Matthew 12:1-14. In that...

https://babylonbee.com/news/saint-anthony-asks-god-what-he-did-to-deserve-an-eternity-of-looking-for-everyones-car-keys

Yup.

(It's "blonde" by the way. "blond" is the male term, while "blonde" is the female term. Unless that's the entire joke, in which case WHOOSH! Right over my head...)

The problem with this argument is that it doesn't take into consideration that sometimes, even in the Bible, some things are called by the name they are given before they are given it. The city of New York comes to mind. The city was founded in 1624, but wasn't named "New York City" until 1664...

Not by much, if at all. It was still an election process on the part of the state legislatures, which, as far as I can gather, were themselves composed of elected members, though Google isn't being very helpful right now in my search for how they were chosen... so if that's wrong, please...

Senators in the US Government are elected by the people of each state by popular vote. Meaning, they are chosen by the majority. That doesn't protect the minority from the majority. That reinforces the majority. The Senate does not protect the minority from the majority.

False. And certain men came down from Judea and taught the brethren, “Unless you are circumcised according to the custom of Moses, you cannot be saved.” https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Acts.15.1&version=NKJV Do you think these men were wrong in their beliefs that they held, that...

There was a lot of things that Bob did that were ahead of his time, and even a few firsts here and there.

The House of Representatives does not represent the minority, only the majority. One of the responsibilities of government is to protect the minority from the majority.

Dumbocrats are only half of the problem. It was Re-publican judges that GAVE US Roe. See posts #3 and #4. And #8.