Search results

So there was a time before light existed, then God spoke and then it did exist but that isn't "creating light", according to you. You are an idiot! I see that there's still good reason to leave you on ignore.

Okay, so first of all I want to say a very heart felt thank you for actually making a real argument! Imagine how much more interesting and engaging and edifying this website would be if everyone did what you've done here. Not that every single post someone makes has to be a fleshed out argument...

More conspiracy theories? Let me guess, the Freemasons founded the CIA, right?

Then what's the point?

I submit that this is a policy that you cannot follow. Why? By what logic? Who is being harmed by an honest use of such terms? How is it more honest to avoid the use of accurate labels?

Yes, I am more often than not. On the contrary! I find it amusingly flattering that you think I'm the genesis of that teaching! Do you read anything that isn't written by a Catholic? "John 1:1 In the beginning was Logic, and Logic was with God, and Logic was God. 2 He was in the beginning...

I was big fan of Spock when I was a teen but now, as an adult, I notice constantly how illogical the character was. As for my avatar, I like using any form of triquetra. Until I just now looked it up, I had no idea there was anything that was called a "Triskelion", never mind that the avatar I...

No, it isn't. Yeah, well since He never said that, you're point is sort of lost, isn't it? Nope! Still not a ad hominem. The term "ad hominem" IS NOT synonymous with "insult"! It just isn't what it means. If you refuse to figure it out or find that you cannot figure it out then the term...

You missed the point. It was a rhetorical question. The point was that "honestly representing God's word" cannot be separated from what we believe. Baptists and Catholics disagree on a great many biblical issues. Do you think that one (or both) of them are being dishonest or isn't it true that...

That's you, reading your doctrine into the text. She believed what the angels told her. Being a Christian requires one place their faith in Christ for the remission of their sin, which you don't even believe she needed! Yes, if you understood the dispensation of Grace that was given to Paul by...

Saying it doesn't make it so. Make an actual argument - PLEASE!

I have yet to have A.I. do anything that's all that super impressive other than to be able to properly (mostly) interpret and respond to human language. I mean, it's an amazingly useful tool but its nowhere near becoming sentient or even intuitive, so far as I've seen. One thing's for sure, the...

This statement is more true than you're likely willing to admit! Jesus wasn't simply logical, He is Logic! John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing...

I agree that no such right exists but the argument here is incomplete. It isn't immoral because God said so but rather the reverse. God said it is immoral because it is objectively immoral. Why then is it immoral? Simply put, because it leads to death, which is what it means to be immoral...

Yes.

This is an argument for why you aren't a Christian, not why you aren't a dispensationalist. Yeah, many Catholics have simply embraced communism. Yikes! (y) There is actually some significant disagreement amongst dispensationalists about both Communion and water baptism. As for me, I consider...

If that were true, both of those sentences would be irrelevant. Do you mean, "What is important is that we honestly believe that we are representing the word of God and face up to reality when it proves us wrong."? Why? Do the terms "Open theism", "Calvinism" and "Mid-Acts Dispensationalism"...

No it isn't! That's just ridiculous! How on planet Earth could it be a ad hominem to lament the near continuous and almost universal misuse of the term "ad hominem"? People throw the term around exactly as if it is synonymous with calling someone a name. IT ISN'T! That isn't what it means! And...

Just as you cannot prove there there were, is that what you mean? No, of course, that isn't what you meant but perhaps you're a step closer to understanding why people ought never be asked to prove a negative. This point is neither relevant nor in dispute. It doesn't matter if they were. I...

Romans 15:20 And so I have made it my aim to preach the gospel, not where Christ was named, lest I (Paul) should build on another man’s foundation, 21 but as it is written: “To whom He was not announced, they shall see; And those who have not heard shall understand.” 1 Corinthians 3:10...