Search results

There is no way he will get a Trumpslide if he signs democrat poo such as this. He won't, and you know it.

Melchizedek was medical person, i.e.. priest to Abraham. It matters little to me that you think of the overall account, because you are flatly wrong about. Melchizedek seems to be a non-(h)eber shemite at worst, but you are an idiot to associate a Moloch with the human melchizedek.

So what you are saying is that as a jew, even jew have your own gospel. Wha' jew gonna do about it?

I made it a little clearer for you.

What are you going to do about it?

Τί οὖν ἐροῦμεν ὁ νόμος ἁμαρτία μὴ γένοιτο ἀλλὰ τὴν ἁμαρτίαν οὐκ ἔγνων εἰ μὴ διὰ νόμου τήν τε γὰρ ἐπιθυμίαν οὐκ ᾔδειν εἰ μὴ ὁ νόμος ἔλεγεν Οὐκ ἐπιθυμήσεις Romans 7:7 Whyfore we tell ourselves by a law the wrong, it wouldn't be but a wrong I wasn't feeling; except with the law a covet. I wasn't...

Yes, it does; except for cermonial law, of which kosher laws aren't.

But you don't believe God delivers on the afterlife.:cool:

Yes, you spam about God not reviving the dead.

Yes, it is, dork. What do you the mark was? Yeah, it said, have compassion on me, I am a murderer. SARCASM!!

No, you are the gullible one who thinks God has something against dead people.

YOU ARE THE CYNICAL ONE WHO DOESN'T BELIEVE GOD AWAKES THE DEAD. The burden of proof is on your cynicism.

NO, the Tenach. A torah is just one suggestion in Hebrew. Yes, Cain is glorified in the narrative. The reality is that god made him the first negro to punish him more.

Cain was unreformable at that point. Your story is a forgery. It did happen literally, fool. Clement of 'Rome's LXX has a more accurate account which doesn't try to redeem Cain like the traditional hebrew text tries to.

I am talking about the time Abel loses on Cain. Your "god" (i.e. your version) is weak. It can't even wake the dead. pathetic.

So God was not preserving the mind of Abel after Cain had slain him. What a sense of justice your "god" hasn't!

But mankind should. I don't see your point here also.

Morelike the servants of Herod threatening Jesus, to which Jesus reply was that he was doing miracles. What was the Herod to do? He was timid according to the account. More BS; it was the servants of Herod. Was Herod going to punish him for good deeds?

I don't see your point.

Yeah, law engorgement, I mean enforcement, was so innocent then. Especially this Herod, who wasn't threatening him, but rather feeling kind and timid.:loser: