Search results

  1. O

    Trump Impeachment Trial Following Capitol Hill

    No, you didn't, thou ignoramus. It was legislation, and any changes in the constitution takes a 2/3rds majority. Which wasn't in the legislation. IT ALSO TAKES TWO-THIRDS TO IMPEACH. There will be no impeachment.
  2. O

    Trump Impeachment Trial Following Capitol Hill

    You don't know the constitution. It takes a 2/3rds majority to change the constitution.
  3. O

    Trump Impeachment Trial Following Capitol Hill

    Prove it.
  4. O

    For Those Who Still Insist That There Was Election Fraud

    @Arthur Brain A pass making you ignorant. Being an ignoramus is bliss.
  5. O

    For Those Who Still Insist That There Was Election Fraud

    The New American is not tabloid, and thou wantest to be an ignoramus.
  6. O

    Trump Impeachment Trial Following Capitol Hill

    If they ever did get a 2/3 majority, you would have to find a court to enforce the unconstitutionalness of the trials ruling. It isn't an impeachment now that Trump is no longer president.
  7. O

    For Those Who Still Insist That There Was Election Fraud

    Because you won't read it. Since you don't read the New American, you want to be an ignoramus.
  8. O

    For Those Who Still Insist That There Was Election Fraud

    It is important to defend the product which they can't do. It is insecure, and they know it. It is counting glitches and is high-tech, but it is still fraud. In fact, the greater the technology used, the more there is vote fraud.
  9. O

    For Those Who Still Insist That There Was Election Fraud

    So you think Dominion's slander and lawsuit are fair? up yours.
  10. O

    For Those Who Still Insist That There Was Election Fraud

    She has damaged their sales. Yes, their reputation shall not recover.
  11. O

    Are you Going to Heaven?

    @aCultureWarrior Perhaps, we should use the word blaspheme, because the term means to say or write which is not true. Blasphemes don't have to be religious, and you are a blasphemer.
  12. O

    For Those Who Still Insist That There Was Election Fraud

    They aren't debunked and aren't baseless. Their systems are insecure. Why would Powell have damaged their reputation effectively, if it wasn't true?
  13. O

    For Those Who Still Insist That There Was Election Fraud

    Dominion Voting Systems: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com
  14. O

    Buyer's Remorse

    https://heavy.com/news/dominion-voting-systems-glitch-clinton-pelosi-michigan-georgia/
  15. O

    Are you Going to Heaven?

    No, the word I am looking for is slander. Libel is just slander that is written rather than spoken. slander Middle English sclaundre, slaundre, from Anglo-French esclandre, alteration of escandle, from Late Latin scandalum stumbling block, offense — more at SCANDAL defame verb Save Word To...
  16. O

    A promising COVID Treatment

    No, just you. There is more $$ in worthless vaccines which don't have their contents on the labels..
  17. O

    Are you Going to Heaven?

    As if you are a prophet. Wanting to be more like Christ could mean you need to be crucified, and ignore the commandment against slander. It is called thou shalt not bear wall witness against thy neighbor.
  18. O

    Are you Going to Heaven?

    No, you don't get the benefit of the doubt. You are slandering liberal. You pay heed to heed to ignoramuses like Joe Scarborough and Steve Schmidt, and ignore National Review, but the John Birch Society and Wackenhut are suddenly Libertarian. While you can't prove that Trump didn't organize...
  19. O

    Are you Going to Heaven?

    It's just that National Review is Libertarian. And you pardon them whenever you can. Something wrong here?
  20. O

    Are you Going to Heaven?

    @aCultureWarrior I think it should be noticed the Libertarian publication National Review is not mentioned by you. A good search with Bing reviews a picture of the "Ayn Rand Reconsidered" cover that is in the wikipedia article for National Review, August 30, 2010.
View older results
Top