Search results

The Lord Jesus Christ met all conditional needs to save men.

Only the other side :z With 'so what?' ? I'll think about it. No, just reading most physicists who say so. Was I aware of those who aren't convinced? Yes, but those are few. Not at all. I gave you metric vs American standard as a discussion point. Look, all you are doing is trying to...

A little misleading: 1) I'm not a carrier if my antibodies kill it on contact 2) The amount of time I'd be a threat to anybody is a much smaller window.

It doesn't matter if one is Calvinist, Lutheran, Methodist, Catholic, or Open Theist (not sure any of the above were Calvinists, certainly not Hillsong). It matters rather if one is loving his/her Savior. Isn't it odd, that one can lose his/her Savior for the forest? So very very odd to...

Still appreciate any man that has his Savior first. I also have not bought stocks, so if that has changed, would appreciate words of advice if time warrants it...

He doesn't like the version translated. For me: Acts 4:11 Jesus was given and the known result was that He'd be a Stone of stumbling to many, but to those who come to know Him, the Chief Cornerstone of all they are and believe. God gives grace and moreover, as the Hound of Heaven (see...

The guy "flowers" interrupts RC Sproul way too often. If I'd commented on his video: "Just let the guys speak man! We don't need your commentary."

Or rather "His" conditions.

This took me awhile to appreciate. I was under the 'assumption' that it didn't stop the disease, just made it milder. The media and doctors could have done a better job: it really does keep it from being transmitted in most cases. I was fully unaware of that when I got the vaccine. I took...

I was going to say something funny, but in the end, you are correct.

I really need to brush up on Euro-lingo!

Depending on what 'exists.' I don't grasp, not being God, that He is Spirit. There is no person on earth that can explain that to me. We have a 'spirit' but we take that on faith, having lost touch through the Fall. The physical is different than properties of God.

Neither (I agree with you). If people 'assume' something, that is their problem. You cannot think God is being deceptive: it is His universe to speed up or slow down or work as fast as He likes etc. Men are incredibly myopic at that point, THAT is the problem, not God. They make...

Agree, nothing in this universe is infinite. It is a creation. God can create beauty instantaneously. I don't know if He did, but He was setting up creation the way He wanted it and, I think, making it beautiful for us as well as Himself. In a sense, you and I are somewhat in 'two places'...

You'd have to try a bit harder than "so what?" I just left you to your own devices. "You don't care" is what I read and I'm okay with that. We don't have to agree on everything. It'd be great if we talked about the difference, but I think we already have, to me, the thread has meaning...

🆙 No? No? Btw, the 'standard model' allows atoms to move forward and backward in time. I've pointed that out before. Both models show time as attached to the physical universe, a property of it.

You are among a few trickling physicists and theologians that don't like his theories. The rest, to date, not only adopt him, they use his math every day as the industry standard. After that, "you don't understand a word I have said, do you?" God has 'no past' or a 'past that is still...

At this point, I think most of it is discussed as to where we are and what everyone understands regarding the term priest. I am washed in His sacrificial blood He offered up so see Him as my priest. It'd fall on another at this point to discuss why 'priest' is inappropriate for the Lord...

Yes it does: you are perfectly fine to translate an adverbial phrase with the verb helper: Running bear (verb run, that can be changed to modify a noun, thus adjective or an adverb "the water is running over river rocks"). Pro does mean before, even if it is 'positional' as you say later...

'during' and began are two separate things. Greek plurals don't always translate as '-s' but let's take Enyart's idea: "Before" Before times of all ages? Simply trying to restructure doesn't obfuscate the meaning. Yes it does. While I agree that these aren't verbs, they are fine to...