But not MSM.
And you had to search for it.
Stuff like this should be headline news for any new organization. Yet they're trying to hide it.
Talk about an echo chamber...
So guys, what's it like living in a boring echo chamber nowadays?
- Thread starter Arthur Brain
- Start date
But not MSM.
And you had to search for it.
Stuff like this should be headline news for any new organization. Yet they're trying to hide it.
Talk about an echo chamber...
Axios has now put out an article on it, and wouldn't you know it...
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Yes, I think it was ABC but I don't remember.
No, I didn't. I clearly told you it I knew because it had been in my newsfeed, and I clearly said "I just did a search," meaning I did the search right before I replied to you.
It's all over the place, JR. I use DuckDuckGo, and the page serves up a mix, in this exact order:
CNN
AP News
NY Post
Wikipedia
CBS
ABC7
Fox News
MSN
ABC
Why are you fixated on this story? Is Why not any other crime in our violent country, like this one, also in August?
Man at large after allegedly killing 4 family members, leaving baby alive in Tennessee: Officials
A manhunt is underway for a 29-year-old man who allegedly killed four people and left their baby alive, Tennessee authorities said.
abcnews.go.com
Is it because your social media algorithm is in constant rage mode? Is it because the more you click on these stories, the more rage it'll give you, and the comments will become uglier and uglier, until they're screaming to you that all your white women are in danger from [insert any number of racist epithets]? Would you have been as outraged if the victim hadn't been a beautiful white woman?
Why are you fixated on this story? Is Why not any other crime in our violent country, like this one, also in August?
Man at large after allegedly killing 4 family members, leaving baby alive in Tennessee: Officials
A manhunt is underway for a 29-year-old man who allegedly killed four people and left their baby alive, Tennessee authorities said.
Is it because your social media algorithm is in constant rage mode? Is it because the more you click on these stories, the more rage it'll give you, and the comments will become uglier and uglier, until they're screaming to you that all your white women are in danger from [insert any number of racist epithets]? Would you have been as outraged if the victim hadn't been a beautiful white woman?
Five years ago, a felon overdosed on fentanyl during an arrest and the nation burned over it. Now, when a woman is actually murdered and it blows up the internet, the reaction is to dismiss it or scold people for paying attention. That’s the hypocrisy I’m calling out.
No, this isn’t my “algorithm” at work. Algorithms amplify, but they don’t choose which stories get turned into moral crusades and which get buried. That choice comes from editors and politicians. Seeing the double standard isn’t “rage mode,” it’s refusing to pretend not to notice.
And the “beautiful white woman” jab misses the point. It’s not her looks that matter, it’s the fact that some victims are elevated endlessly while others are ignored because they’re inconvenient. That inconsistency is the real scandal.
If anything, pretending not to see that double standard is the real echo chamber.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
The felon currently serving time for murdering George Floyd by kneeling on his neck for nine minutes was convicted by a jury.
"Now, when a woman is actually murdered?" Women are murdered every day, JR. Where is your daily outrage? Why this case? Because the outrage machine, driven by racism, is in full swing. Yes, algorithms amplify, and yes, by choosing your stories for you. That's literally how amplifying works. Every time you interact, the algorithm hands you more of the same. Algorithms are designed to assign higher values to emotions of fear, anger, and disgust, because those emotions keep users more engaged. As for double standards - there's a well-known double standard when it comes to white female victims and this double standard is what's feeding your algorithms. If the murderer had stabbed a Black woman, would you have posted about it at all?
Chauvin was convicted because he was white, and because the left was calling for his conviction.
He did not murder George Floyd.
The fact that you aren't aware of this shows how deep inside the echo chamber you are.
The official autopsy report listed high amounts of fentanyl (and at least 6 other drugs/chemicals), and ZERO life-threatening physical trauma.
He died from a drug overdose. He wasn't murdered.
Here is the official report:
George Floyd Autopsy
Way to completely ignore the rest of the sentence.
Try again.
I'm disgusted every day by what our nation has come to.
There is no more arguing with your side.
Especially when people like Charlie Kirk are being assassinated by deranged leftists because of the narrative they've been fed.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
He did. And he was convicted for it in a jury trial.
And the Supreme Court declined to hear his appeal.
Agreed.
We don't know yet who murdered Charlie Kirk.
Last edited:
Saying it doesn't make it so, Anna.
The autopsy shows he wasn't killed by Chauvin's knee on him.
Go read the autopsy, Anna. Again.
It's completely irrelevant who did it.
The fact that he was assassinated by the left at all shows just how ROTTEN your side is, and the fact that leftists are CELEBRATING his assassination shows just how vile they've become.
Warning: GRAPHIC!
Spoiler
