Idolater
Popetard
Named for the late Pastor Bob Enyart of happy memory, who originated, created, authored and developed it. It is a system of doctrine developed with the Enyartian method, also originated by Enyart.
Anything (whatsoever) that originates from Enyart is Enyartic, and everything all together which originates from Enyart, constitutes Enyarticity. Enyarticity is the total domain of anything that originates from Enyart, depends on Enyart, or is intelligible only because of Enyart.
The study of Enyartism is called Enyartology, and one who studies Enyartism is an Enyartologist.
The study of the Enyartian method (but not necessarily Enyartism) is Enyartianology, and one who practices this is an Enyartianologist. Furthermore, one who studies the Enyartian method in order to try to improve upon it, is practicing Enyartianologianism, and is an Enyartianologianist.
However, Enyartism itself is also not monolithic and unchanging, but can be developed further, advanced, improved, refined, and/or revised, either through the application of Enyart's own Enyartian method, or through some other methodology or framework. If this work uses the Enyartian method it is called Enyartianism, and one who does this work is an Enyartianist. An Enyartianist is one who uses the Enyartian method, believes in Enyartism, and studies Enyartism. In contrast, Enyartology need not result in refinements to Enyartism, it can merely be the study of Enyartism, or, as Enyartism develops into different versions and revisions, it can be the study of Enyartisms.
One can study Enyartism(s) without accepting any version of Enyartism—you can be an Enyartologist without being an Enyartist.
One can theoretically use the Enyartian method without being an Enyartist (you might believe in Enyart's Enyartian method, and use it to develop a new non-Enyartistic system or doctrine using Enyart's Enyartian method). You would be Enyartian (in method), but not an Enyartist, nor necessarily an Enyartologist (if you don't use the Enyartian method to study Enyartism).
One who uses the Enyartian method to study Enyartism is both Enyartian in their method, and also an Enyartologist, but they would still have to accept, promote and/or practice Enyartism to be an Enyartist, and an Enyartianist (one who uses the Enyartian method, to study Enyartism, and who also believes Enyartism). iow you could use the Enyartian method (and be Enyartian), study Enyartism (and be an Enyartologist), but not believe Enyartism, and so not be an Enyartist (or an Enyartianist).
And the last piece is Enyartismology, which is the advancement of Enyartism without using the Enyartian methodology to do so, but instead using some other methodology or analytic framework. An Enyartismologist would be an Enyartist who is using something other than Enyartian methodology to develop Enyartism further.
» I had some AI models condense and distill the above for easier reading:
The above is set out as a formal taxonomic system. It is a vocabulary to categorize every possible relationship a person can have with Pastor Enyart's work. It is a precise exercise in nomenclature. It attempts to transform a theological legacy into an exhaustive, and intellectually rigorous formal logic system.
Next up: What is Enyartism (as a system of doctrine)? and what is the Enyartian method of Biblical interpretation and reasoning?
I offer this thread in honor of Pastor Enyart. I think he deserves to have his name attached to his theological legacy.
Anything (whatsoever) that originates from Enyart is Enyartic, and everything all together which originates from Enyart, constitutes Enyarticity. Enyarticity is the total domain of anything that originates from Enyart, depends on Enyart, or is intelligible only because of Enyart.
The study of Enyartism is called Enyartology, and one who studies Enyartism is an Enyartologist.
The study of the Enyartian method (but not necessarily Enyartism) is Enyartianology, and one who practices this is an Enyartianologist. Furthermore, one who studies the Enyartian method in order to try to improve upon it, is practicing Enyartianologianism, and is an Enyartianologianist.
However, Enyartism itself is also not monolithic and unchanging, but can be developed further, advanced, improved, refined, and/or revised, either through the application of Enyart's own Enyartian method, or through some other methodology or framework. If this work uses the Enyartian method it is called Enyartianism, and one who does this work is an Enyartianist. An Enyartianist is one who uses the Enyartian method, believes in Enyartism, and studies Enyartism. In contrast, Enyartology need not result in refinements to Enyartism, it can merely be the study of Enyartism, or, as Enyartism develops into different versions and revisions, it can be the study of Enyartisms.
One can study Enyartism(s) without accepting any version of Enyartism—you can be an Enyartologist without being an Enyartist.
One can theoretically use the Enyartian method without being an Enyartist (you might believe in Enyart's Enyartian method, and use it to develop a new non-Enyartistic system or doctrine using Enyart's Enyartian method). You would be Enyartian (in method), but not an Enyartist, nor necessarily an Enyartologist (if you don't use the Enyartian method to study Enyartism).
One who uses the Enyartian method to study Enyartism is both Enyartian in their method, and also an Enyartologist, but they would still have to accept, promote and/or practice Enyartism to be an Enyartist, and an Enyartianist (one who uses the Enyartian method, to study Enyartism, and who also believes Enyartism). iow you could use the Enyartian method (and be Enyartian), study Enyartism (and be an Enyartologist), but not believe Enyartism, and so not be an Enyartist (or an Enyartianist).
And the last piece is Enyartismology, which is the advancement of Enyartism without using the Enyartian methodology to do so, but instead using some other methodology or analytic framework. An Enyartismologist would be an Enyartist who is using something other than Enyartian methodology to develop Enyartism further.
» I had some AI models condense and distill the above for easier reading:
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Enyartism | The doctrinal system attributed to Enyart |
| Enyartian method | Enyart’s method of reasoning or interpretation |
| Enyartology | Study of Enyartism |
| Enyartianology | Study of the Enyartian method |
| Enyartist | One who accepts or advocates Enyartism |
| Enyartian | One who uses the Enyartian method |
| Enyartianist | An Enyartist who also develops Enyartism using the Enyartian method |
| Enyartismologist | An Enyartist who develops Enyartism using another method |
- Enyartism: the substantive ideas.
- Enyartian method: the way those ideas are developed or defended.
- Enyartology: study of the ideas.
- Enyartianology: study of the method.
- Enyartianism: revision of the doctrine through the method.
- Enyartismology: revision of the doctrine through a different method.
The above is set out as a formal taxonomic system. It is a vocabulary to categorize every possible relationship a person can have with Pastor Enyart's work. It is a precise exercise in nomenclature. It attempts to transform a theological legacy into an exhaustive, and intellectually rigorous formal logic system.
Next up: What is Enyartism (as a system of doctrine)? and what is the Enyartian method of Biblical interpretation and reasoning?
I offer this thread in honor of Pastor Enyart. I think he deserves to have his name attached to his theological legacy.
