British rape gangs

ok doser

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
annabenedetti said:
"People can assault girls in our society and they can get away with it"

Yes they can.



An Oklahoma man facing nearly eight decades in prison for the sexual and physical abuse of two teenagers is instead walking free.

18-year-old Jesse Butler admitted to raping two former girlfriends when he was still a minor. He pleaded no contest to 10 felony charges.

Butler was initially charged as an adult, but in a turn of events, that status was reverted to being considered a so-called youthful offender because it happened while he was under the age of 18. That means, in spite of his 78-year prison sentence, he is walking free.
Click to expand...
Pretty sure we're talking about Britain in this thread.

Your post has been reported for an attempt to derail it.

Bad bananahead!
Bad!
 
Arthur Brain

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
VladtheDestroyer said:
Yet the article Anna posted, which you just stupidly agreed with, doesn't provide new data. It just argues that we can't know what the real stats are. :LOL:
Click to expand...

Yet taking an article that uses flawed methodology to arrive at an arbitrary, attention grabbing figure at face value is...intelligent? Again, this is why I don't get any of my news from social media platforms or talking heads that affirm preconceived biases because invariably, there's little to no truth in it and hyperbole galore.

Yes, there have been scandals and as I've said already, Rotherham was a high profile case that made headline news and rightly so, so there is no need to blow figures out of proportion.
 
VladtheDestroyer

VladtheDestroyer

Well-known member
Arthur Brain said:
flawed methodology
Click to expand...

No Arthur. There is a lot you are not understanding here. Let me try to explain it to you another way.

In the 1980s, when gays started the AIDS epidemic, doctors in the USA were trying to figure out how many homosexual men had AIDS. It's their job to do stuff like that. But they only had a limited amount of data at first, because the epidemic had just started. So they pulled datasets from a few specific communities that were known for homosexual activity (because that's where most of the AIDS was, in New York, San Francisco and Orlando IIRC). And they used this data to give a nationwide figure as to how many gays likely had AIDS. Because they wanted to know the infection rate, so they could determine whether or not this problem would go away on it's on.

They determined it would not. And this year, the US is going to have to spend 32 billion dollars (yes billion) on AIDS research and treatment. Domestically.

Would you say their methodology was flawed?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top