Religious Zealotry

annabenedetti

like marbles on glass
Nothing. They are keeping their perversion out of public view. Let God deal with them.

Exactly. You've just made my argument for me.

Teaching kids to accept homosexuality and teaching them how to pleasure homosexual partners is hardly "consenting sex between adults."

That's right, it isn't. Get and or keep your kids out of the public school system and if they are in the system, write them out of sex ed classes.
 

annabenedetti

like marbles on glass
I just made the similar observation … reminds me of the Phil Robertson threads if the past.

I was just thinking about those threads this morning, and the TOLers using the reasoning that Mary was likely only 12 years old to advocate for marrying off minor girls. I don't think any of those threads made it past the purges.
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
There are laws on the books criminalizing sex with underage kids so don't try to pretend there aren't.
There are situations where they are not enforced at least in New York state.

In New York state if a child is examined in a medical setting like an emergency room and there is evidence of sexual abuse it's a state law that it must be reported regardless of the desire of the child or the parent. Similarly if a teacher sees evidence of abuse of any kind they are also required to report it.

But that same child, regardless of age, can go to Planned Parenthood, with the most definitive evidence of sexual abuse imaginable, get an abortion without her parents' consent or having been informed, and the facilitators of the abortion are not required to report the incident of sexual abuse.
 

annabenedetti

like marbles on glass
They were an embarrassment… no wonder.

This isn't one of those threads but the subject matter is the same. Some of the advocates for early marriage are in the thread, but not all of them.

 

marke

Well-known member
Exactly. You've just made my argument for me.



That's right, it isn't. Get and or keep your kids out of the public school system and if they are in the system, write them out of sex ed classes.
My kids all attended our Christian school and several of their kids have also attended and some have already graduated.
Nevertheless, I will voice my disapproval of sexual exploitation and perversion of kids in American public schools because I am an American.
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
This isn't one of those threads but the subject matter is the same. Some of the advocates for early marriage are in the thread, but not all of them.

I was a junior in high school at 16, and while I was not mature enough to have been successful at marriage I knew fellow students who were, both male and female.

Similarly I knew young women in the urban schools that I taught in who were thrust into roles of responsiblity at a young age for families that their mothers couldn't provide for and their fathers had abandoned. I believe they would have been successful in a marriage at 15 or 16.

And for much the same reason, young Amish women.

They were trained for the role. At 15 or 16 they had the training and the experience to take on the role, to keep a household, to care for children.
 

PureX

Well-known member
Can you tell us something you are wrong about but still hold to?
That wasn't what I wrote.

What I wrote was that we understand that we CAN always be wrong, even when we think and feel that we're right. Because we understand that we're not infallible. And we know this because we have often discovered that we were wrong about things in the past that we had been convinced at the time that we were right about.
Although you said so with a smile, you did just say I'm less than human. That's worse than honestly calling a person who doesn't listen to reason "stupid".
Sorry, friend, but you really need to read more carefully.

Here is what I wrote: "They (not you) become a human; one among many, as opposed to imagining themselves to be some sort of infallible demigod, lording their imagined righteousness over everyone they encounter." I did not say or imply that anyone is less than human. I said that some people seem to think they are more than human: they seem to think they are semi-divine.
 

PureX

Well-known member
When I was a teenager I was propositioned several different times by homosexuals breaking the law, and I could easily see why those laws were in place. I don't want homosexuals propositioning kids and yet that is what perverted school teachers and officials are doing today in public schools of all grades.
No, it isn't.

As you stated, it's against the law. No school teacher is sexually propositioning any kids regardless of their or the kids gender, because it is illegal. And if it does happen, the kids, or anyone that knows of it (including you) should report it to law enforcement. They would be investigated and prosecuted for it. Law enforcement takes that sort of thing seriously. And so do most school administrators.

You should have told someone when you were a kid that you were being propositioned. You should tell your kids to speak up if anyone ever sexually propositions them, too. Sitting around imagining some evil hoard of pedophilic homosexuals has taken over the democrat party and the public schools and whatever else is just insanity. And it solves nothing. If you actually KNOW of any instances of adults sexually propositioning kids you should report it to the police, immediately. They will investigate it, and even if it can't be prosecuted, you have shown a light on it and the pedophile in question will be under scrutiny in the future.
 

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
I was alluding to the fact that God condemned homosexuals to death on earth in the OT, but that there is no such law for NT saints to put homosexuals to death on earth.
I know that's what you were doing. My point is precisely that.

In short, you need to adjust yourself. Paul explicitly states that homosexual deserve death.

Romans 1:18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, 19 because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. 20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, 21 because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Professing to be wise, they became fools, 23 and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man—and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things.​
24 Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves, 25 who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.​
26 For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. 27 Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due.​
28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting; 29 being filled with all unrighteousness, sexual immorality, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil-mindedness; they are whisperers, 30 backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 undiscerning, untrustworthy, unloving, unforgiving, unmerciful; 32 who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them.​
You need to watch this video. Trust me, you'll like it and agree with it..

 

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
I'm not contesting what the Bible says, I'm contesting the idea that what the Bible says should be used to make laws in this country regarding capital punishment for homosexuals. The fact remains that fundamental Christian belief about executing homosexuals is comparable to Sharia in Islam about executing homosexuals. The similarity is there. It doesn't belong in American civil government.
God HIMSELF said...

Leviticus 20:13 If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them.

WAS GOD WRONG?

Answer the question!
 

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
You are not God. You do not speak or think for God. Your judgment is not God's judgment. Your idea of righteousness is not God's idea of righteousness. You cannot see what God can see. You cannot know what God can know. You have not been appointed God's instrument of judgment or wrath. Your idea of a righteous America is no one's but your own. It is not God's, and it has no moral authority over anyone else's idea of a righteous America.

Yet you seem not to be able to accept this.
No one is pretending to speak for God. That's why there's a bible. You don't believe the bible is God's word but I know that it is for a fact. Rigtheousness is NOT a matter of opinion. Something is either righteous, evil or amoral. If you (i.e. anyone) believe something immoral is righteous then you are wrong - period.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
It's not a copout, JR. Just my common-sense opinion that we're not getting anywhere

Well we certainly won't get anywhere if you drop out of the conversation.

and if I continue to push back on you, you'll ban me at some point.

Only if you break the rules.

Do you plan on breaking the rules if we continue?

If I told you I thought you the way you truncated my sentence so you could answer it in a different way as my original sentence was meant, and when I tell you that you say "so what," would you ban me for saying what I thought about it?

Probably not.

Because that's how I think it'll end up if we continue.

Supra.

But you are fine with heterosexuals propositioning kids?

Of course not.

If that were the case, you would clearly state adults shouldn’t proposition or mess with kids.

Adults shouldn't proposition or mess with kids.

Happy?

What you leave out of your post is telling insofar as your actual dedication to the issue.

Leaving something out doesn't mean that he supports it. It just means he (or anyone, for that matter) is focusing on something else that's more important.

I was a junior in high school at 16, and while I was not mature enough to have been successful at marriage I knew fellow students who were, both male and female.

Similarly I knew young women in the urban schools that I taught in who were thrust into roles of responsiblity at a young age for families that their mothers couldn't provide for and their fathers had abandoned. I believe they would have been successful in a marriage at 15 or 16.

And for much the same reason, young Amish women.

They were trained for the role. At 15 or 16 they had the training and the experience to take on the role, to keep a household, to care for children.

That's the clincher, isn't it?

Parents (especially mothers) of two generations ago were taught that it's ok (and to be clear, there's nothing inherently wrong with it) for women to enter to workforce, and are even encouraged to do so.

But that means that they weren't at home raising their children, especially their daughters, teaching them valuable lessons in maturity and particularly on how to be a good parent, so that by the time they reach graduation, they know little to nothing about raising children.

Those daughters now have children of their own, and while they've tried to be good parents, without the foundations that should have been provided by their mothers, they aren't the best parents they can be. And so they go to work, maybe have a few romps in the bed with a guy they like, and now she's pregnant and not married, and now has to work extra hard to support not only herself, but her child(ren) as well, and sends them off to some stranger to teach them in her place.

And now, those children are currently at this very moment going through high school, having sex with sometimes multiple guys throughout her high school life, drops out of school because her parent (singular) can't afford to put her through classes, being a bad example to her children, with no one to support her.

That's the state of the US right now, and probably most first-world nations.

And that's all before considering government welfare programs, and the psychological effects of no father figures in their life, and let's not forget the homos and trannies and pedophiles pushing their agenda into the schools these days.

All because the women of two generations ago didn't bother training up their daughters to be good mothers, and to seek a husband to take care of them.

What I wrote was that we understand that we CAN always be wrong, even when we think and feel that we're right.

What makes you so sure you're the one in the right on this? Are you not also included in that "we"? Or do you just exclude yourself because you must be right, there's no possibility for you to be wrong?

Because we understand that we're not infallible.

You apparently don't.

And we know this because we have often discovered that we were wrong about things in the past that we had been convinced at the time that we were right about.

What have you discovered that you were wrong about in the past that you were convinced you were right about?

Here is what I wrote: "They (not you) become a human; one among many, as opposed to imagining themselves to be some sort of infallible demigod,

NO ONE here is claiming (or imagining) themselves to be some sort of infallible demigod.

It's a straw man on your part to even make such a statement in this conversation.

lording their imagined righteousness

What if you're wrong that it's "imagined"?

What if it's ACTUALLY righteousness that we're promoting? Wouldn't that mean you're going against what is righteous?

over everyone they encounter." I did not say or imply that anyone is less than human.

Calling a human being anything other than a human being is, by definition, calling them less than human.

I said that some people seem to think they are more than human: they seem to think they are semi-divine.

Pretty sure no one in here thinks that.

No, it isn't.

Do you live under a rock, or something?

See my last post to Arty.

As you stated, it's against the law.

Just because something is against the law doesn't mean it doesn't happen.

No school teacher is sexually propositioning any kids regardless of their or the kids gender,

I'm just going to let you Google "Teacher arrested for sex with student" on that one, because it's blatantly false.

because it is illegal.

Again, just because something is illegal doesn't mean it doesn't happen.

And if it does happen, the kids, or anyone that knows of it (including you) should report it to law enforcement.

They should, but they don't, for various reasons, like fear of standing out, of repercussions, of nothing being done.

They would be investigated and prosecuted for it. Law enforcement takes that sort of thing seriously. And so do most school administrators.

Only when they're caught. Most of the time it's swept under the rug or ignored.

You should have told someone when you were a kid that you were being propositioned. You should tell your kids to speak up if anyone ever sexually propositions them, too.

My children (if I ever have any) will be homeschooled. They will never have to worry about any of this.

Sitting around imagining some evil hoard of pedophilic homosexuals has taken over the democrat party and the public schools and whatever else is just insanity.

We're not imagining it. Just read/watch the news.

And it solves nothing. If you actually KNOW of any instances of adults sexually propositioning kids you should report it to the police, immediately. They will investigate it, and even if it can't be prosecuted, you have shown a light on it and the pedophile in question will be under scrutiny in the future.

You sure about that?
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Well we certainly won't get anywhere if you drop out of the conversation.



Only if you break the rules.

Do you plan on breaking the rules if we continue?



Probably not.



Supra.



Of course not.



Adults shouldn't proposition or mess with kids.

Happy?



Leaving something out doesn't mean that he supports it. It just means he (or anyone, for that matter) is focusing on something else that's more important.



That's the clincher, isn't it?

Parents (especially mothers) of two generations ago were taught that it's ok (and to be clear, there's nothing inherently wrong with it) for women to enter to workforce, and are even encouraged to do so.

But that means that they weren't at home raising their children, especially their daughters, teaching them valuable lessons in maturity and particularly on how to be a good parent, so that by the time they reach graduation, they know little to nothing about raising children.

Those daughters now have children of their own, and while they've tried to be good parents, without the foundations that should have been provided by their mothers, they aren't the best parents they can be. And so they go to work, maybe have a few romps in the bed with a guy they like, and now she's pregnant and not married, and now has to work extra hard to support not only herself, but her child(ren) as well, and sends them off to some stranger to teach them in her place.

And now, those children are currently at this very moment going through high school, having sex with sometimes multiple guys throughout her high school life, drops out of school because her parent (singular) can't afford to put her through classes, being a bad example to her children, with no one to support her.

That's the state of the US right now, and probably most first-world nations.

And that's all before considering government welfare programs, and the psychological effects of no father figures in their life, and let's not forget the homos and trannies and pedophiles pushing their agenda into the schools these days.

All because the women of two generations ago didn't bother training up their daughters to be good mothers, and to seek a husband to take care of them.



What makes you so sure you're the one in the right on this? Are you not also included in that "we"? Or do you just exclude yourself because you must be right, there's no possibility for you to be wrong?



You apparently don't.



What have you discovered that you were wrong about in the past that you were convinced you were right about?



NO ONE here is claiming (or imagining) themselves to be some sort of infallible demigod.

It's a straw man on your part to even make such a statement in this conversation.



What if you're wrong that it's "imagined"?

What if it's ACTUALLY righteousness that we're promoting? Wouldn't that mean you're going against what is righteous?



Calling a human being anything other than a human being is, by definition, calling them less than human.



Pretty sure no one in here thinks that.



Do you live under a rock, or something?

See my last post to Arty.



Just because something is against the law doesn't mean it doesn't happen.



I'm just going to let you Google "Teacher arrested for sex with student" on that one, because it's blatantly false.



Again, just because something is illegal doesn't mean it doesn't happen.



They should, but they don't, for various reasons, like fear of standing out, of repercussions, of nothing being done.



Only when they're caught. Most of the time it's swept under the rug or ignored.



My children (if I ever have any) will be homeschooled. They will never have to worry about any of this.



We're not imagining it. Just read/watch the news.



You sure about that?
When I participated on the feminist group on Facebook I would often remind them of the feminist saying from the seventies - a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle. And then when they would rail against young men being raised to be misogynists and rapists, I would always blame only the mother. "These young men in college are all rapists" they would say. "There is a rape culture!" they would say.

And I would say back "Their mothers raised them to be rapists. Every single young man who rapes was raised by his mother to be a rapist"
 
Top