Arthur Brain
Well-known member
To be fair I did indulge it but yeah. Surprised he hasn't even bored himself with the "Darwinist" trope by now...Only Stripe could turn a thread about election fraud into a thread about "darwinists" and "evolution".
For Those Who Still Insist That There Was Election Fraud
- Thread starter Arthur Brain
- Start date
Right Divider
Body part
And yet you cannot explain why. You just make a claim, like you always do. And we a just supposed to believe you?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Well, considering that there were two posters on here who are both professional scientists and believers who extolled evolution then that kinda kicks evolution as being some "atheistic cult" into touch in itself. You can buy into whatever bunk you want RD. If you think the same as Stripe then you're as dumb as he is. If you actually do have some semblance of integrity where it comes to science you'd be chiding Stripe for asserting such nonsense, not supporting him.
Right Divider
Body part
I buy real science. Your worship of your fellow evolutionists is so cute though.
Stripe and I understand science, unfortunately you do not.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
You most certainly don't if you're stupid enough to think that the theory of evolution is associated with atheism, cult or associated in science. That is the remit of dope mentality.
That isn't cute, it's just thick.
Right Divider
Body part
It is certainly not associated with science.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Thicker still. Of course it is. Fact. That it doesn't fit into your "ideals" regarding what constitutes science can be discarded more than easily enough. You sure ain't an arbiter on that score, in fact you're anything but.
Well, yes, I do.
Darwinism failed the entropy test.
Reason.
Maybe. But you offer nothing to support your assertions. I guess you think people will change their minds because you can shout?
Darwinism failed the entropy test.
That you can call me names doesn't refute nothing.
No link. No reference. No description.
You offer nothing but your obviously ignorant opinions.
Darwinists love the appeal to popularity. It's their first and usually only port of call.
But all you will do about it is screech.
Fish. The collective noun for whales is "pod."
No, you won't. You'll just spam up another thread.
Last edited:
Remember that time Blablaman thought he had refuted a point I made because I quoted an author and he had a signed copy of the author's book?
I do. His argument was the author's words did not mean what they said because he had attended a lecture and gotten a scrawled message in a book. He dined out for weeks on the seals clapping for him.
Of course, he never actually addressed the issue.
I do. His argument was the author's words did not mean what they said because he had attended a lecture and gotten a scrawled message in a book. He dined out for weeks on the seals clapping for him.
Of course, he never actually addressed the issue.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
The theory of evolution has failed no such thing. You can assert it as much as you like, it still won't mean anything.
You're not being called names. If you assert something as ridiculous as the ToE being some atheistic cult then that is simply a monumentally dumb thing to say and it's not insulting to point that out. You typed it so it's on you. That's yet more out there conspiracy drivel on your part which is on par with the oddballs who still think that Trump was defrauded of the last election.
You know fine well that both Alate & Barb are believers so no link should even be necessary. They schooled you often enough through the years on here.
The screeching is all yours and you're actually spamming up my thread with your silly "Darwinist" soundbites. Go do it elsewhere thanks.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Nope, how about you link to it on a relevant thread?
Georgia did a hand recount of the ballots and the results corresponded with the numbers from the machines. Why did Republicans who voted for Trump want to find a Biden win?
A minority of prideful, willful, and arrogant Americans stubbornly persist in believing their predictions despite reality.
Democrats have won. Nobody is allowed to do deep-dive investigations into their Soros-backed voting machines and they have covered their tracks anyway so the voter fraud will be hard to detect even if investigators did finally get their hands on the machines and their memory cards. Democrats know proving voter fraud requires lots of time and money that most states do not want to spend, especially since most Americans don't think it matters that much whether crooks win by fraud or not.
Right Divider
Body part
Please quote any post where Alate & Barb "schooled" anyone... I've love to see it.
Favorite democrat talking point: There is no evidence of fraud.
Fact that democrats do not like to be mentioned: There will never be any evidence of voter fraud as long as democrats continue to successfully obstruct every serious and thorough investigation into their activities.
Democrats have never proven many of the multiple appearances of democrat voter fraud are not in fact evidence of voter fraud.
Wickedness and stupidity turned a request to look into tens of thousands of unverified ballots for evidence that even a small percentage of them may be fraudulent into the lie that the request was for the man to manufacture fraudulent votes.
Yes, democrats twice verified the questionable signatures on tens of thousands of mysterious ballots for Biden and then recounts proved that there were still as many questionable ballots for Biden as democrats had claimed.
Of course it has.
As luck would have it, I provide reasons for what I believe.
Oh, no. No.
You never call anyone names.
Your beliefs about whales don't mean much when they aren't here to protect you.
The screeching is all yours.
Naw.
Address the issues sensibly. Stop screeching. Who knows. You might be able to convince someone of something. Offering nothing but hysteria and insults ain't gonna change nothing.
It was ages ago. It hasn't survived. But there were enough fanboys clapping like seals, someone is bound to recollect.
And if they don't, oh well. I don't care.
You sure seem to.
Before nuclear fusion was adopted by scientists as the source of the sun's energy, gravitational contraction was the established and accepted theory. The problem with gravitational contraction was that it led to the conclusion that the sun could not burn longer than 30 million years, which was a problem to the shoddy Darwinist theories that were emerging.
Even after secularists abandoned gravitational contraction for the more nebulous nuclear theory, they had to invent an invisible particle to balance their equations related to conservation of energy for the facts to agree with their new theory. It took secularists 80 years to find evidence to back up the idea of the neutrino and even then the 'proof' was shoddy.