glorydaz
Well-known member
That person they are implying is morally superior and innocent, is the rapist.
When your premise is a LIE, all the words surrounding that premise are nothing but bluster and blow. Way to go, Miss Bluster and Blow. :thumb:
That person they are implying is morally superior and innocent, is the rapist.
....you've assumed a man did not deserve something he may very well have deserved.
Ah, you make up your own definition for the word "gossip", too, I see. Do these things just pop out of your mouth, or have you written them down somewhere?
"He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings,"
Ah, you make up your own definition for the word "gossip", too, I see. Do these things just pop out of your mouth, or have you written them down somewhere?
not a nice thing to say about your hubby :nono:
but i suspect you know him better than I do :idunno:
The problem is that your idea of "justice" does not always comport with God's.
Your "sense of justice" is that which YOU decide is just depending on your own ethical standard...
So whine away, Elo, as all little gods do. You have no standard except what you make up on your own.
Like claiming stripping is not immoral? :rotfl:
You're only a little god in your own mind, Elo. Stamping your little foot might make them jump at home, but not out here in the real world.
Until some time in the world system warps it. Like it has yours and Elo's when you think stripping and such behavior is totally fine and undeserving of any consequences at all.
Quote me or retract the false accusation.
That won't happen because you never said any such thing. Neither did I.
_____Devoting oneself to serve does not imply a sense of justice
deserve
1250-1300; Middle English deserven < Anglo-French, Old French deservir, Latin dēservīre to devote oneself to the service of, equivalent to dē- de- + servīre to serve
_____
It implies a causal relationship.
You know my point with the quotation is not about him, but GD.
You know my point with the quotation is not about him, but GD.
I didn't say my husband was those things because he hasn't departed from wholesome words. The scripture is only useful where applicable. And as I see it, we have yet another scripture for her to sort through as she considers her actions at TOL.
glory's a chick, not a dude
You're being obtuse.
There's nothing wrong with my actions here on TOL.
You call good "evil" and evil "good" as you prove over and over again.
You bear false witness a lot.
There you go bearing false witness again.
You bear false witness a lot.
There you go bearing false witness again.
:blabla:
:blabla:
The word deserve can be used facetiously, as it was in another thread. A person claims he eats at restaurant X, get the runs and deserves it for eating at restaurant X. Obviously what happened wasn't deserved and the use of the word is clearly facetious.
obviously, a single word can have different definitions or nuances of definition