I associate IP with Lamont because Fred called him, "you big dummy"
"...big dummy" is what IP is essentially calling you - IP is Fred; not Lamont :chuckle:
I associate IP with Lamont because Fred called him, "you big dummy"
Nope, don't know where you got that.
What a lunatic you are! Seek some professional help.
Huh?
So for the last 10x I've seen this, you were stuck, unable to answer the simple question and wrong.
That would be a 'summary' of you. Do you now understand a 'summary'?
"...big dummy" is what IP is essentially calling you - IP is Fred; not Lamont :chuckle:
What does that have to do with Malachi?I said that because there would be no difference between saying the NT and saying the apostle's accounts and letters.
You are such a goofball.To help I'm now going to refer to the AAL because you are SO OFFENDED and distracted by what the contents of the NT actually are.
What does that have to do with Malachi?
You are such a goofball.
What does that have to do with Malachi?
You are such a goofball.
It's been several days now and no MAD 2P2P has been able to summarize any of those passages in the OP list. In fact, one of them even asked a brilliant question: what is a one line summary? Real growing pains!!!
the point was that the AAL can be called the NT. You miss it every time.
If you have an actual proposition to make about what is the NT or what is the new covenant go ahead, but it better almost everything in Heb 10A.
the point was that the AAL can be called the NT. You miss it every time.
If you have an actual proposition to make about what is the NT or what is the new covenant go ahead, but it better almost everything in Heb 10A.
By contrasting Heb 10A with Gen 24B, I conclude that you are incorrect.
What does that have to do with Malachi?the point was that the AAL can be called the NT. You miss it every time.
See Jeremiah 31 and Hebrews 8.If you have an actual proposition to make about what is the NT or what is the new covenant go ahead, but it better almost everything in Heb 10A.
:french:It's been several days now and no MAD 2P2P has been able to summarize any of those passages in the OP list. In fact, one of them even asked a brilliant question: what is a one line summary? Real growing pains!!!
Because of what and about what in Heb 10? You think you are clear but it is unspecific muck, known only to you, and you are unwilling to spell it out. It is a skill called ARTICULATION.
Rom 4 is the last word on circumcision on Abraham, not you, so once you have sent a paragraph on this, if you can, I'll be going back to Rom 4 for the final.
:french:
What does that have to do with Malachi?
See Jeremiah 31 and Hebrews 8.
If you were really a genius you'd have realized that I was mocking you.
And, yes it was muck, like your posts.
Hebrews 8 confirms the nature of the NEW COVENANT as being with the houses of ISRAEL and JUDAH. You do the "spiritual Israel" dance to deny this PLAIN and CLEAR Word of God.But don't neglect Heb 10 which says that it is all now and completely operating now. And of course, has nothing to do with the land as though you could have two kinds of truth being true at the same time but not meaning the same thing. 2P2P is modern in the cultural sense and helped cause the whole 'this is my truth' revolution; a revolution against truth.
"BTW" should be capitalized, you language scholar.btw, the name of Christ in this age is THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS which is where we get Rom 3, 10 (the intro), I Cor 1's title, 2 Cor 5 God was in Christ... etc. It's the most beautiful thing!
Oh, do the right people appreciate your sense of humor--the kind that is not grounded in truth?
Once AGAIN, the land promise is NOT CANCELLED just because it's not repeated in very passage of the so-called NT.