Oh, come on. You're getting a bit carried away, here. "We" managed to gain a number of important socialist concessions in the years after the Great Depression, including the break up of the larger monopolies and the end of speculative investment banking.
Cosmetic changes that didn't do anything about fundamentally changing the nature of our society and which did nothing to check the power of oligarchs here or anywhere else. Even if what you suggest is true--that we, the people, somehow managed to outwit and outfight the elite for the first time in our nation's history--we're right back where we started, if not in worse shape, than we were then. So if there was anything gained (and that's disputable) it's all been completely lost.
We instituted social security, welfare for the poor, the 40 hour work week, and ended child labor. It was fantastic progress compared to the ruthless greed that controlled this country prior to the depression.
We've always been controlled by ruthless greed. Sophistication hasn't changed that. In the words of C. Montgomery Burns, let the fools have their tartar sauce. These are all good, admirable strides. But they haven't changed anything about the fundamental structure of society. We still work more, play less, earn less, and learn less than the Greatest Generation who earned these "strides" you speak of. We have better toys, true. And as I said earlier our creature comforts have gotten better as the overall standard of living has increased. In the end, however, we're all still serfs.
We haven't squandered all these gains, yet, but we are clearly headed in that direction.
Couldn't disagree more.
I agree. That's exactly why we don't care when our neighbor loses his job, his home, his health, or even his life. Because all we really care about is how we're doing.
Usually people don't get involved until it's personal.
So the question is, how many of us will have to lose everything before there will be enough of us willing to fight back?
Barring a complete collapse, most of us won't lose everything, and we don't have to (nor do the elites need to drop the bottom totally out to get what they need, though they certainly could if it suited them).
This is where you're wrong. The military is still run by us.
What world are you living in and what are you smoking.
And I do not believe it will turn on us even if the government tells it to.
Then you're totally naive.
In every other country where this happens, it only happens after the government manages to create a military that sees itself as being set apart from the civilian population.
No, you simply need enough people in uniform to do as they're trained and follow orders. For crying out loud, man, look around. It's happening and happened. The military as such doesn't need to do the dirty work. They've turned cops into an adjunct of the military in everything but name.
Either by religion, or ethnicity, or by long political and cultural bias … one way or another, they see themselves as their own separate entity within the population of their own countries. Once this idea is developed, and set, the military can be turned against the population if necessary.
See above. We're all potential combatants, all potential threats, all potential terrorists. Most importantly, we aren't them. That in and of itself is enough. Always.
However, 'we the people' better be damn sure that we teach our young people, as they join the military
We could start by making sure they don't join in the first place. Just a thought.
to be very wary of any sort of indoctrination that tries to teach them that they are somehow set apart from the general population.
I think you're living in a kind of bubble.