I have NEVER agreed with Ask Mr. Religion. The man doesn't have a clue. What the heck are you talking about.You agree with him yet you call him a heritic. :wazzup:
I have NEVER agreed with Ask Mr. Religion. The man doesn't have a clue. What the heck are you talking about.You agree with him yet you call him a heritic. :wazzup:
His testimony is great. He is my favorite lay theologian and speaker.
I have NEVER agreed with Ask Mr. Religion. The man doesn't have a clue. What the heck are you talking about.
I've already answered---and corrected---you on these points. See my previous posts above.Stop, before you even say it. I know what you are going to say. Bowing down to a king was giving honor to him as a king. However...
Here we have a clear indication that you simply do not know how to interpret the Bible. You're tripping over the archaic language of the KJV, it seems. Consider the text in the Revised Standard Version:Besides, the Bible says to avoid having any appearance of evil.
Your assertion that "to" ("toward") and "before" ("in front of") "are the same thing" is noted. Better alert the folks at the Oxford English Dictionary! :doh:For there is no difference between bowing TO vs. bowing BEFORE a statue. You are attempting to split hairs. Both ARE the same thing.
Join the Catholic Church if you agree that the scriptures cannot be understood by your own studies.
I understand the entire counsel of the word of God.
If you join the Catholic faith you give up the right to study God's word yourself.
You however don't have a problem with this approach now. Therefore if you are not convicted by God to examine His word then by all means disappear into the masses...
Join the Catholic Church if you agree that the scriptures cannot be understood by your own studies.
I understand the entire counsel of the word of God.
If you join the Catholic faith you give up the right to study God's word yourself.
You however don't have a problem with this approach now. Therefore if you are not convicted by God to examine His word then by all means disappear into the masses...
I like cruciform and nihilio but a fear that they unlike you Richy are not mere layman.
I understand the entire counsel of the word of God.
I doubt they are, but what difference does that make?
Of course, that's nonsense. Where did you ever get such an assumption?If you join the Catholic faith you give up the right to study God's word yourself.
Nope. I've been involved in an in-depth men's Bible study at my Catholic parish for years.Well, I was under the impression that Catholics discourage personal bible study.
Nope. I've been involved in an in-depth men's Bible study at my Catholic parish for years.
Of course, that's nonsense. Where did you ever get such an assumption?
Well, I was under the impression that Catholics discourage personal bible study. I apologize.
My faith is convicted to study scripture from the Jewish perspective. While much of the New Testament can benefit from the study lens of Greek and roman culture, there is much that is imperative to be seen from a first century Jewish believers perspective such as the gospels. That Jewish frame of reference is zero from the Catholic's vantage point as they adhere to replacement theology.
My advice is that you follow your conscience but that you keep in mind that for the past 19 centuries there has been little to no Jewish converts to Christianity until the 20th century and now we are seeing multitudes of Jews coming to faith in their Messiah. Dr Arnold Fruchtenbaum is the leading Hebrew Christian scholar of our generation. You do well to compare your studies against his at some point in the future. In our world of vast information we are inexcusable to be ignorant of the Jewish frame of reference concerning Jesus' teachings. Many do not represent sound biblical doctrines just like within Protestant and Catholic circles there are degrees of error, so it is within Messianic Judaism. Which is why the Dr prefers the label of Messianic Jew.
Good luck Richo
Presumption, but polite, I will reply in kind.
I always study Jesus' teaching from a Jewish perspective, trying to understand the dramatic effect his words would have had on his listeners. For instance, 'Eat my flesh and drink my blood' was so horrific to a first century Jew's ears...but therein is one example of a reason for my steps towards the Catholic Church...the Eucharist, unadulterated and passed down through tradition and biblical soundness through the centuries. As a protestant I was taught it is just symbolic...
Movies: not a great source for one's comprehension of Catholic belief and doctrine. I love the book, though.The Name of the Rose movie with Sean Connery
Presumption, but polite, I will reply in kind.
I always study Jesus' teaching from a Jewish perspective, trying to understand the dramatic effect his words would have had on his listeners. For instance, 'Eat my flesh and drink my blood' was so horrific to a first century Jew's ears...but therein is one example of a reason for my steps towards the Catholic Church...the Eucharist, unadulterated and passed down through tradition and biblical soundness through the centuries.
Movies: not a great source for one's comprehension of Catholic belief and doctrine. I love the book, though.